Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

SILVER TRADERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 19, 2019)

Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsels for the respondents no.1, 2 & 3 and Shri Gaurav Mahajan, learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 and 5. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 2...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DABUR INDIA LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Aug 19, 2019)

ORDER The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Act' and the ‘UPGST Act', respectively) by M/s. Dabur India Ltd., Khasra Nos. 2834, 2835, 2836, Amka Road, Dhoom Manikpur, off  NH-91, Dadri, Gautam Buddha Nagar, U.P.-203207 (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant") against the Advance Ruling Order No. 25, date...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MACRO MEDIA DIGITAL IMAGING PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Aug 19, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NOVEL ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL WORKS PRIVATE LIMI..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Aug 19, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called 'the CST Act'), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

T.P. ROY CHOWDHURY & COMPANY PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Aug 19, 2019)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further time as me...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SIEMENS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Aug 19, 2019)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further time as me...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Jugsalai P.S. Case No.75 of 2018 (G.R. No. 1845 of 2018) registered under sections 120(B)/415/420/425/464/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code read with section 132(1)(b)/132(1)(c)/132(1)(e) and 132(1)(1) of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2.  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. P.P. for the State. 3.  The Learned ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. None appeared for the respondents inspite of intimation. 2. Mr. Badheka, learned Counsel appearing in support of the petition states that the respondents have been served and he undertakes to file affidavit of service on or before 21st August, 2019. 3. This petition challenges the rejection of a refund claim on the basis of an explanation to Rule 93 of the CGST Rules and MGST Rules. 4. The respondents have not appeared despite intimateion. We are adjourning this petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Aug 16, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017) are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NUETECH SOLAR SYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Aug 16, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act, 2017 and KGST Act, 2017) are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).