Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

DWARIKESH SUGAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jan 22, 2020)

Sub:- GST ACT, 2017 - Advance Ruling U/ s 98 - liability to tax under GST Act in respect to application dated 24.09.2019 of M/s. Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Limited, P.O.- Medpurasultan, Najibabad, Nagina Road, Bundki, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh - Order- Reg. 1) M/s. Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Limited, P.O.- Medpurasultan, Najibabad, Nagina Road, Bundki, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh- 246 762 (here in after called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTIN: 09AABCD8192N1ZO. 2) T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Rajasthan Commercial House, B-115, Road No.9, VKI Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against Order No. 04 dated 14.09.2018 issued vide C.No. IV(39)148/Misc Enq/E-way Bil/T-II/2018/Pt/7644 dated 14.09.2018 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax, Division-A, Jaipur (hereinafter also re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been taken out by one Bajrang Trading Company praying inter alia, for the following reliefs:- "(a) Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 01.12.2018 passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition); (b) Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to revoke the cancellation of registration of the petitioner forthwith." The subject matter of challenge, being the impugned order dated 1st December, 2...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIMAL RAJ vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER-1, KOTTAYAM


(Kerala High Court | Jan 22, 2020)

The case projected in this writ petition is as follows: The petitioner would contend that the impugned orders, ie, Exts.P3 to P3(1) are illegal and arbitrary, due to the following reasons. a) There cannot be any orders passed against a deceased under the statute. b) Provisions of Section 93 of CGST Act has not been followed while issuing Exts.P3 series. c) Show cause notices prior to Exts.P3 series were not served by the 1st respondent. 2. Accordingly, the petitioner would...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 22, 2020)

1. The Draft Amendment is allowed. The same shall be carried out earliest. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):- “58(A) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ of mandamus or a writ of certiorari in the nature of mandamus or certiorari any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, ordering or d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. Complaint No.34/2019 is pending before the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences) Jaipur Metropolitan, for offence under Sections 132(1), (b), (c), (f), (g), (k), (i) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 69 of CGST Act punishable under Section 132(1) (i) and (iv) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with 132(5) of CGST Act. 3. It is cont...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 2. We have heard learned counsels at the admission stage and in view of the order that we propose to pass, we do not consider it necessary to call for any reply. The petitioner has assailed the show cause notice issued to the petitioner dated 21.11.2019 and the demand of tax with interest and penalty of the same date. The grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned show cause notice is vague and does not, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CEAT LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Calcutta High Court | Jan 22, 2020)

The Court : This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has complained of inaction on the part of the respondents authorities for granting it refund of IGST levy for exports made to Bhutan under section 54 of the CGST Act. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that requisite application has not been made before the concerned officer and accordingly the same should be made to the Assistant Commissioner(Preventive), Dinhata...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court dated 19th June, 2019, the Gujarat Commissionerate verified the credit availed by the writ-applicant and accordingly, issued a certificate in that regard. This part of the procedure is completed. 2. On 26th December, 2019 this Court passed the following order. “The learned advocate for the petitioners has placed on record a certificate of verification dated 23.7.2019 issued by the office of the Principal Commissioner, Central GST, Co...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. WISE DESIGN COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 22, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. WISE DESIGN COMMUNICATIONS PVT. LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the fol...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).