Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

ORDER The matter was listed as item No.1 but passed over as non-appeared for respondent-Department. The position was not different on the second call when the matter was called out at 12.45P.M. We thus proceeded to hear learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to contend that the Officer who carries out an audit should not be the Officer who passes an assessment order and in that respect a number of judgments have been delivered by the Divi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S DUA INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 28, 2020)

[1] These petitions have been filed with the prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari declaring Rule 117 of CGST Rules 2017 and HGST Rules 2017 ultra vires the provision of Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017 and seeking directions to the respondents to open the portal for the petitioners to upload the form TRAN-01. [2] Notice of motion. [3] Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana accept notice for respondent-Union ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case set up in the W.P.(C.) is as follows : That the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing supply of man power to various establishments as per their respective requisitions. Petitioner is a tax assesse having GSTN 32AEMP3886J1Z1. The 3rd respondent is subsidiary of Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited, a Government of India Enterprise. The winding up proceedings of the 3rd respondent company has been initiated and the 4th respondent herein was appointed as the Liquidator....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER   The learned counsel for the petitioners having argued the mater for some time, now fairly submits that an appeal is provided under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017 and they would avail the same provided some interim protection is afforded by this Court, lest otherwise the purpose of filing of the appeal should be defeated. There is force in this submission apart from fairness.   In the above circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
[1] These petitions have been filed with the prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari declaring Rule 117 of CGST Rules 2017 and HGST Rules 2017 ultra vires the provision of Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017 and seeking directions to the respondents to open the portal for the petitioners to upload the form TRAN-01. [2] On 16.01.2020, following order was passed:- “At the very outset, counsel for the petitioner(s) state that they are not pressing the issue of the vires o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SATYESH BRINECHEM PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jan 28, 2020)

M/s. Satyesh Brinehem Private Limited (herein after referred to as “the applicant”) raised the following question for advance ruling in the application for Advance Ruling filed by it. “Whether input tax credit is admissible to the applicant under the GST Acts in respect of bunds which are constructed and used in the manufacture of salt and bromine chemicals?” 2.1 The applicant submitted in the application for Advance Ruling that the applicant is setting up a Gr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GANESH CERAMICS


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 27, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Ganesh Ceramics, East of 70 Fit, IOC Road, Patna (Bihar) (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order dated 10-10-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by Assistant Commissioner (Anti-Evasion), Central Goods & Services Tax Commissionerate, Alwar (hereinafter also referred to as “the adjudicating authority”). Brief f...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HIMANI MUNJAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Supreme Court | Jan 27, 2020)

ORDER Considering the fact that offence is punishable with a maximum sentence of five years and the petitioner has already undergone sentence for a period of one year five months and she has a child of three years old, without commenting on the merits of the case, we direct release of the petitioner on bail, in connection with complaint No.35/2018, during the pendency of the trial and her furnishing personal bond for a sum of ₹ 5 Lacs with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfac...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The relief sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for issuance of a writ to the respondents granting permission to the petitioner to submit TRAN-1 form electronically by opening electronic portal or in the alternative allow the petitioner to tender the form manually and thereafter the petitioner's claim be assessed for input tax credit in accordance with law. 2. Brief facts which led to the filing of the present writ petition is that, the petitioner ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the impugned demand notice dated 17.01.2020 (Annexure P/4) which is an order of demand of tax and penalty issued by the respondent No.5. 2. The brief facts, which led to the filing of the present writ petition is that, the respondent department had intercepted a Truck bearing registration No.C.G.04-ME-3494 on 14.01.2020. In the course of interception of Truck, the authorities concerned found that the vehicle was carrying large quan...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).