Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

ORDER C.M.No.3084/2020 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 969/2020 and CM Appl. 3083/2020 2. Notice. Mr. Rohan Anand and Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocates accept notice on behalf of Respondent No.1, and Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 respectively. 3. Reply be filed within four weeks and rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date of hearing. 4. There are three main submissions made by the Petitioners at this stage: first, that the impugned order of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TIKAULA SUGAR MILLS LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 27, 2020)

Rejoinder affidavit filed toady be kept on record. This writ petition has been filed against the order of the Appellate Court dated 3.10.2019 by which the appeal has been dismissed as being barred by limitation. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the appeal is to be filed by a person aggrieved and the order also ought to have been communicated to the person who is aggrieved. It is clear from the counter affidavit, which has been filed by the State,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JKB MOTORS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Jan 24, 2020)

The prayers in the above W.P.(C.) are as follows : “(i) To call for the relevant records relating to Exhibit P8 letter to the 7th respondent in compliance with judgment dated 15.02.2019 (ii) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other appropriate direction or order directing the respondents to transfer balance of input tax credit lying in the petitioner's CENVAT ledger as on 30.06.2017 to the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger forthwith. (iii) Pass such other appropria...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is a transporter and had been engaged to transport a consignment by Essar Steel India Limited from Kancheepuram District to one Neel Metal Products Ltd. situated at Krishnagiri District. Essar Steel and Neel Metal are referred to as 'consignor' and 'consignee' hereafter. 2. The consignment was accompanied by invoices. An e-way bill had been generated on 12.01.2020 at 7:23 p.m., valid till 16.01.2020. However, the lorry had broken down on 13.01.2020...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HDFC BANK LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-H


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 23, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s HDFC Bank Limited, IInd Floor, JTN Anukampa, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 45 / GST / REFUND /FINAL/2018-19 dated 13.09.2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by -Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-H, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as “the adjudi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. By this writ petition, a prayer is made for release of vehicle bearing U.P.-32 CN-5694 ceased by the respondents. It is when the vehicle carrying goods were found to be carried in violation of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017( for short 'Act of 2017'). The petitioner is the vehicle owner and appeared before the competent authority with a request to release the vehicle. 2. The prayer made by the petitioner was not accepted by the respondents and accordingly an...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present petition is for grant of regular bail to the petitioner who was arrested on 07.10.2019 under Section 69 read with Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'the Act'). Briefly, the allegations against the petitioner are to the effect that he alongwith Gulshan Dhingra and others were involved in the business of generation and selling of fake tax invoices without supplying the goods through various firms/companies. These firms/companies were...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R   1. We have heard learned counsels at some length. 2. During the course of the arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has raised few issues which we propose to deal today. 3. Mr. Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed that this Court, in its order dated 18.09.2019, had directed the respondents to publish the e-mail Ids and telephone numbers of the Nodal Officers widely, including on the GST Website; Delhi GST Website and CBIC Website. He poi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KWALITY MAKERS SNACKS PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 23, 2020)

1. By way of this Writ Application, the writ applicant seeks to challenge the show-cause notice in FORM-GST MOV-10 of the CGST Act, 2017. The writ applicant has been issued notice, calling upon him to show cause as to why the goods and the conveyance should not be confiscated for the alleged contravention of the Provisions of the Act and the Rules. 2. We are not inclined to interfere at this stage. Ultimately, if a final order of confiscation is passed, the same would be appealable under ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHIT MINERALS PVT LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA & 1 OTHER


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 23, 2020)

JUDGMENT ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. B. PARDIWALA ) 1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned writ-applications are the same, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. 2. In all the captioned writ-applications, the writ-applicants have challenged the levy of the IGST on the estimated component of the Ocean Freight paid for the transportation of the goods by the foreign seller as sought to be levied and collected from the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).