Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

M/S. MAYANK VINODKUMAR JAIN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 22, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. MAYANK VINODKUMAR JAIN, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question: ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. LAS PALMAS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 22, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. LAS PALMAS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 22, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPESH GUPTA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (ANTI EVASION) , CGST C..


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Jan 21, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by Shri Deepesh Gupta S/o Shri Suresh Gupta, Prop. M/s Diamond Marble & Granites, Marble Mandi, 200 Ft By Pass Road, Alwar (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against Order No.IV(6)45/AE/Alwar/2018 dated 05.10.2018 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by Assistant Commissioner(Anti Evasion), Central Goods & Service Tax Commissionerate, Alwar (herein...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANAS RANJAN PAHI


(Calcutta High Court | Jan 21, 2020)

This is an application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. with a prayer for enlarging the petitioner on bail on any condition with complaint case being C-04/2020 under Section 69 read with Section 132(1)(d) and 132(5) of the CGST Act, 2017 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sealdah. It is submitted that DGGI had already completed preliminary investigation, examined the material witnesses and even seized documents relating to the payment of GST along with 4...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner has approached this Court assailing an order of the respondent dated 19.09.2019 conveying to him the decision of the IT Grievances Redressal Committee not to permit it to file a Tran-1 in the absence of any evidence of technical/system error. However before me, learned counsel for the petitioner would maintain the statement in affidavit to the effect that there were glitches in the GSTN portal and petitioner was thus unable to file/upload GST Tran-1. Admittedly, and a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER W.P.(C) 627/2020 1. Issue notice. Counter-affidavit be filed within six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed before the next date. 2. List the petition for hearing on 11.08.2020. C.M. No. 1740/2020 3. The petitioner - who is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of books, is registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”). The business involves procuring raw materials and allied goods from the domestic ma...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MYRAYASH HOTELS PVT. LTD. vs. THE UNION OF INDIA


(Bombay High Court | Jan 21, 2020)

1. Heard Mr. Patkar, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Pangam, the learned Advocate General for the respondent nos.3 and 4, Ms. Asha Desai, the learned Counsel for the respondent nos.1 and 2 and Mr. Shivan Desai, the learned Counsel for the respondent no.5. 2. In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following substantive reliefs : “(a) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to declare that the para 2 of the Schedule II to the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Shri Irshad Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Gopal Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3. 2. The petitioner, who is a transporter, has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 30.11.2019- Annexure no.3 to the petition, on the ground that he is a transporter and on 15.11.2019, goods of the respondent no.4 was loaded in his truck no.U.P. 21 CN 5694 for it's transportation from Delhi to Arhiya, Bihar....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Kushagra Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Q.H. Rizvi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents State. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is challenging the order of penalty dated 26.09.2019 issued under Section 129 (3) of the CGST Act, 2017 (Annexure no.5). The petitioner is having remedy to file an appeal against the impugned penalty order under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).