Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

ANMOL INDIA LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant company engaged in import of non-coking coal from foreign countries has prayed for the following relief(s):- “12(A) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction against the respondents by quashing the impugned Notification No.8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification No.10/2017Int...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAI JAWAN JAI KISAN SUPPLIERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. The learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Chintan Dave waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant-a proprietary concern, through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRADIP CHIMANLAL MEVADA vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) To issue writ or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction the respondent to allow the petitioner to file the form GST ITC-01 in order to claim the input tax credit of the petitioner to which it is entitled as per the provisions of Section 18 of the CGST and GGST Acts, 2017; (b) To issue necessary writ(s), d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondent to release the seized goods along with the truck under Section 129(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 on such terms and condition which may be deemed fit and proper to ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ESSAR POWER GUJARAT LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) This Hon'ble High Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari / mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction against the Respondents by quashing the impugned Notification NO.8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification NO.10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 2862017 by declaring that same lack legisl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
As the petitioner in these two cases is the same person, and as the issues raised in these cases are also similar, these cases are disposed of on the basis of this common judgment. The prayers in WP(C).No.807/2020 are as follows: “i. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exhibit P1 & P1A and Ext.P2 & P2A notices issued by the first respondent herein, by demanding to remit disputed CGST, SGST and Penalty from the petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The matter was listed as item No.1 but passed over as non-appeared for respondent-Department. The position was not different on the second call when the matter was called out at 12.45P.M. We thus proceeded to hear learned Senior Counsel for the appellant. Learned counsel for the appellant seeks to contend that the Officer who carries out an audit should not be the Officer who passes an assessment order and in that respect a number of judgments have been delivered by the Divi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S DUA INDUSTRIES AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 28, 2020)

[1] These petitions have been filed with the prayer for issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari declaring Rule 117 of CGST Rules 2017 and HGST Rules 2017 ultra vires the provision of Section 140 of CGST Act, 2017 and seeking directions to the respondents to open the portal for the petitioners to upload the form TRAN-01. [2] Notice of motion. [3] Mr. Abhinav Singh, Advocate for Mr. Sourabh Goel, Advocate and Ms. Mamta Singla Talwar, DAG, Haryana accept notice for respondent-Union ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case set up in the W.P.(C.) is as follows : That the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing supply of man power to various establishments as per their respective requisitions. Petitioner is a tax assesse having GSTN 32AEMP3886J1Z1. The 3rd respondent is subsidiary of Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited, a Government of India Enterprise. The winding up proceedings of the 3rd respondent company has been initiated and the 4th respondent herein was appointed as the Liquidator....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER   The learned counsel for the petitioners having argued the mater for some time, now fairly submits that an appeal is provided under Section 107 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017 and they would avail the same provided some interim protection is afforded by this Court, lest otherwise the purpose of filing of the appeal should be defeated. There is force in this submission apart from fairness.   In the above circumstances, these writ petitions are disposed of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).