Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

SHREE NANDWANA TRANSPORT vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned Respondent authorities to forthwith Truck No.MH-48-AG-0126 belonging to the petitioner; [B] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: [A] A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus to quash and setting aside the notice issued by the respondent no.2 for confiscation of goods and conveyances and levy of penalty under Section 130 of the GST Act; [B] A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DANGAR BHAGWANBHAI MITHABHAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the order of detention dated 10.7.2019 passed by the respondent no.3 under section 129(1) of the GST Act of the goods and conveyance bearing Truck No.GJ-04-U-5196 at Bhavnagar at about 3:30 a.m. on 10....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A AND S METAL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: [A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside the order of detention dated 12.7.2019 passed by the respondent no.2 under section 129(1) of the GST Act of the goods and conveyance bearing Truck No.GJ-20-V-9564 at Bhavnagar at about 10:30 a.m. on 12.7.2019...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAYLAKSHMI AGRO FOODS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ-Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant-a proprietary concern, through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GAURAV JINDAL vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

Vakalatnama filed today by S/Shri Gyanendra Singh and Sanjay Shukla, Advocates on behalf of applicant is taken on record. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the condition nos. 1 and 2 imposed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrte, Meerut in the order dated 22.4.2019 granting default bail to the applicant under Section 167(2) CrPC in crime no. 207 of 2019 registered by DGGI, Ghaziabad under Section 132(1(B) and (C) of the Central Goods and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHARAT VIJAY TRANSPORT CO. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon’ble Court will be pleased to admit and allow this petition; (B) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the impugned order passed by the respondent no.3 on 02/01/2019. (C) Pending admission and final disposal of the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BRANDTHOUGHT RETAIL PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Chintan Dave waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant-a proprietorship concerned, through its proprietor, has prayed for the following relief: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Chintan Dave waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant-a proprietorship concerned, through its proprietor, has prayed for the following relief: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “5[A] A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in the nature of mandamus to quash and setting aside the notice issued by the respondent no.3 for confiscation of goods an conveyances and levy of penalty under Section 130 of the GST Act; [B] A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or direction in ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).