Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

RIFTY VINIMAY ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 30, 2020)

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order of detention dated 5th January 2020 passed by the respondent No.2 under Section 129(1) of the GST Act, 2017 and notice issued by the respondent No.2 dated 16th January 2019 under Section 130 of the GST Act in Form GST MOV10. 2. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would file an appropriate application under Section 67(6) of t...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KABIR ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and settin...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGWATI KIRAN STORE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to release the seized goods along with trucks unde...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus quashing and setting aside t...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

REKHA GHANSHYAM RAJAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: [A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside the detention order dated 16.6.2019 passed...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PIYA VIKRAM RAJAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: [A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside the detention order dated 16.6.2019 passed...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting impugned Notice...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE RADHE STEEL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting impugned Notic...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PANCHRATAN SALES CORPORATION vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting impugned Notice...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KANCHAN METAL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2020)

1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “[A] be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting impugned detention order dated 31.7.2019 (annexed at Annexure A) and impugned confiscation notice dated 31.7.2019 (annexed at Annexure B) passed by the learned Respondent No.2; [B] be pleased to issue ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).