Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

M/S. SHAPOORJI PALLONJI AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITE..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 31, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lies before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, They would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PONRAJ (PROPRIETOR M/S. PPP ASSOCIATES)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 31, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lies before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Rulings, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. At the outset, They would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. AUTOMATIVE COMPONENTS TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVAT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 31, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ELECTROPLATING AND METAL FINISHERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 31, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the advance ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. THE INDIAN HUME PIPE COMPANY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 31, 2020)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case projected in the above Writ Petition (Civil) is as follows:- That the petitioner, who is engaged in the business of trading of motor cycles, has entered into a lease agreement with reference to an additional place of business at Karunagappally. The above intention of the petitioner to start additional place of business was intimated to the jurisdictional officer, which can be seen from Ext.P-1. It is stated that a consignment of 10 motor cycles for exhibition purposes at the new ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case projected in this Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows: - That the petitioner is a an assessee to GST in Tamil Nadu. The petitioner made an interstate supply to a customer in Kerala against Ext.P-1 invoice, collecting tax payable under the IGST Act and the above goods were transported to Kerala, supported with invoice and an e-way bill. It is stated that the transport was detained under Sec. 129 of the Act, since part B of the e-way bill was not filled up and hence ₹ 8,10,000/- tow...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.V.P. APPARELS PRIVATE LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 30, 2020)

1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this petition. (B) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a writ of prohibition or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing respondents not to proceed further with reference to the order dated 09.10.2019 passed under section 130 of the GST Act as by holding that he has no author...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These Petitions raise a challenge to the constitution of National Anti Profiteering Authority, apart from other challenges to the impugned order. The reply affidavits in the Petitions have not been filed. When the Petitions came up earlier, we had directed the Authority to adjourn the proceedings beyond the date specified in the Petitions. Today, the learned Counsel for the Respondents informs that in some of the Petitions the Respondents have moved a transfer application in the Supreme Court...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By this Petition the Petitioner has challenged the action of the Respondents in provisionally attaching the bank account of the Petitioner. 2. On 6 December 2019 the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) informed the Branch Manager where the Petitioner holds a bank account that in view of the proceedings filed against one Yusuf Fauzdar Shaikh, proprietor of M/s. Fashion Creations, proceedings have been launched against the said taxable person and the Respondents were o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).