Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


2
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - HC ✔
Telangana High Court ✔

  165 Results

ORDER HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL): Sri Y. Siri Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.4. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned show cause notice was issued bey...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A1 ADIL TRADERS vs. DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER


(Telangana High Court | Mar 4, 2025)

ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri M. Uma Shankar, learned counsel represents Sri V. Veeresham, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Ms. Pravalika, learned counsel representing Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent No.2. 2. With th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice ) In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the show-cause notices and final orders which admittedly do not contain physical or digital signatures of the Proper Officer, although the impugned show-cause notices and final orders were placed on the portal. Contention of the Petitioners:- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners commenced their arguments by placing reli...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAHITHI MARKETERS vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX


(Telangana High Court | Feb 20, 2025)

ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri Mohammed Rafi, learned counsel representing Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent Nos.1 and 3. 2. Heard on admission. 3. The petitioner takes exception to the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 03.05.2024, and the Order-in Original (O.I.O.) dated 24.04.2024 (Ex.P.2). 4. Learne...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri G.Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC for respondent No.1. 2. Regard being had to the similitude of the orders impugned herein, these writ petitions were analogously heard on admission. 3. The facts are taken from W.P.No.36631 of 2024. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India takes exception t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER (PER HON’BLE SUJOY PAUL,J): In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of notification Nos. 13/2022, dated 05.07.2022, 9 and 56/2023, dated 31.03.2023 and 28.12.2023, respectively. The pari materia/ corresponding notification Nos. 118/2023, dated 25.08.2023 and 170/2023, dated 17.12.2023 issued by State of Telangana are also subject matter of challenge. These notifications are admittedly issued in pu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SUJOY PAUL J) Sri Rohan Shah, learned counsel represents Sri C. Nanda Gopal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No. 1 and Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos. 2 & 3. 2. With the consent finally heard. 3. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution takes ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri Venkata Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing on behalf of Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, appears for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. During the course of hearing, the parties agreed that this is second visit of the petitioner to this Court. Earlier, the petitioner filed WP...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT PER   (HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE) Mr. Bathula Raj Kiran, learned Standing Counsel for Excise and Customs for the appellant. Mr. Karan Talwar, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated 20.02.2024 in Customs Appeal No.30323 of 2021 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as, “the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER: (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY) Writ Petition Nos. 19376 and 19411 of 2020 are filed by the Petitioner-M/s. L&T PES JV to set aside the impugned orders of the 6th Respondent-Appellate Joint Commissioner (ST) vide Appeal No. HYR/Refund Appeal/HYR-Dept-02, dated 12.10.2020 insofar as denying the refund of Rs. 13,01,31,759/- for the period from July, 2017 to March, 2019; and Appeal No. HYR/Refund Appeal/HYR-Dept-03 dated 12.10.2020 insofar as de...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)