Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following Delay condoned. We do not find any merit in the present special leave petition, as we have already dismissed SLP (C) No. 7903/2025, titled “Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs v. M/s Aberdare Technologies Private Limited and Ors.”. However, it appears that on account of mistakes or errors getting noticed on the input tax credit, and the input tax credit being subsequently denied to the purchaser, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Since the issue involved in both these writ petitions are one and the same, they are taken up together and disposed by a common order. 2. These Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the impugned assessment order dated 26.04.2024 and the consequent rectification order passed by the respondent on 15.02.2025. 3. Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader (Taxes), takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 4. By consent of the parties, the main Writ P...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNIL KUMAR vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. Relief sought The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.007, dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 318, 319, 336, 337, 338, 340, 61 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 & 132 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST), 2017, Registered At Police Station:-Division No. 4, District Ludhiana, Punjab, 2. Prosecution story setup in the present case...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P. C. 1. Rule. Respondent No. 2 waives service. With the consent of parties, Rule made returnable and heard finally. 2. The above Writ Petition challenges the impugned order dated 30th July 2024 bearing No. SK/175/Appeals – II/MC/2024-25 passed by Respondent No. 2. Though several grounds are raised to challenge the impugned order, one of the grounds is that the Appeal has been dismissed on the basis that the Appeal has not been signed by the authorized signatory and the Appellan...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVA ENTERPRISES vs. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & OTHERS


(Karnataka High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

ORAL ORDER In this petition, the petitioner seeks for the following reliefs: “a. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari to quash the Order of Adjudication bearing No. CTO/LGSTO-155/DRC-7/809/2024-25 dated 27.06.2024 passed and summary of the said order issued in DRC-07 ARN No. ZD290624140404G dated 29.06.2024 by the 4th respondent (Annexure-A); b. Issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari to quash the order bearing No. CTO/Audit/CTP/134/2023-24/T.No.63/202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINAYAK MOTORS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

ORDER 1. Having heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal learned Standing Counsel for the respondents, it remains undisputed that the petitioner's registration under the UPGST Act, 2017 was suspended on January 3, 2024 w.e.f. January 3, 2024. It is not the case of the revenue that the said registration has ever been revived or that the petitioner ever sought revival of that registration. 2. In view of the above, it does merit acceptance th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON’BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Mr. Suyash Agarwal for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the respondent-State. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 17.5.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner, Grade -2 (Appeal -1), State Tax, Noida, order dated 11.11.2023 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Noida Sector 10, Gautam Buddha Nagar, under Section 30 of UPGST Act, and the order dated 5.9.2023 pass...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON’BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Since the similar issues are involved in aforesaid writ petitions, the same are being decided together by this common judgment. 2. For convenience, the facts of the Writ Tax No.1287 of 2024 is being delineated here-in-below: 3. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Rs. Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents as well as Sri Manish Trivedi, learned counsel ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMESHWAR DAS RAM NIWAS vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 09.04.2024 passed under section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 25.02.2025 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as being beyond the limitation. 3. Submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that while passing the order under section 73 of the GST Act, no hearing ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned counsels for Union of India (DRI). 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 132(1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act (CGST), 2017 under Clause(a) or Clause (b) or Clause(c) or Clause (d) of the said section 132(5). 3. The case of the prosecution is that Senior Intelligence Officer of Directorate General of GST Intelligence Zonal Unit, Patna ma...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)