Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


2
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - HC ✔
Punjab and Haryana High Court ✔

  359 Results

GURU KIRPA STEELS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 7, 2025)

SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. 1. The present writ petition is filed with the following prayers:- (i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents not to proceed with the recovery proceedings initiated through the notice for recovery of demand dated 13.02.2025, which demands payment of tax, interest and penalty despite non-constitution of GST Tribunal and the payment of requisite pre-deposit by the petitioner in terms of Section 112 (8) and in violation of Circular...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNIL KUMAR vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 24, 2025)

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. Relief sought The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 482 of BNSS, seeking grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.007, dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-1), under Sections 318, 319, 336, 337, 338, 340, 61 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) 2023 & 132 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST), 2017, Registered At Police Station:-Division No. 4, District Ludhiana, Punjab, 2. Prosecution story setup in the present case...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IHS GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 17, 2025)

ARUN PALLI, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner (IHS Global Private Limited) exports IT/ITeS services to its associated enterprises located outside India. He submits that the petitioner had claimed refund of Input Tax Credit, amounting to Rs.94,71,285/-, for the financial year 2017-18, on account of export of services without payment of tax, under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, vide application dated 27.06.2019 (P-1). It is submit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GARG RICE MILLS AND OTHERS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 12, 2025)

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. 1. This bunch of Writ Petitions, which have been tagged together by the orders of this Court from time to time, raises important questions of law which is to be decided commonly. 2. In some of the Writ Petitions, challenge to the vires of Section 168 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act of 2017) has been made, and in the other cases, the notifications issued under Section 168-A of the Act of 2017 are subject mat...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. 1. Present petition is preferred by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking quashing of the order dated 23.02.2024 (Annexure P-11) passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the petition praying for relaxation of conditions prescribed for grant of default bail, imposed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ludhiana, vide order dated 15.03.2021 (Annexure P-1), has been dis...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VK CONSTRUCTIONS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Feb 24, 2025)

ARUN PALLI, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (VK Constructions) prays for a Certiorari, to quash the order dated 15.01.2025 (P-8), vide which, the Superintendent, Range 28, Kurukshetra Ward 4, Kurukshetra, (respondent No. 2), has rejected the application moved by it, for amendment of the Principal Place of Business, under Rule 9 (4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. For, the necessary address details were incomplete, and valid address was required to be provided by the assesse...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) 1. Relief Sought This petition has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS for grant of regular bail in case No. INT/INTL/41/2024-Gr F-O/o ADGDGGI-ZU-Ludhiana registered under Section 132 of the Punjab Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 at Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Zonal Unit, Ludhiana Punjab. 2. Contentions On behalf of the petitioner Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner has argued that under the special Act i.e. the Punjab Goo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPAK KUMAR vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 8, 2025)

N.S. SHEKHAWAT J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.191 dated 18.06.2019 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 474 and 477-A IPC and Section 132 (1) (b) of Central Goods and Sevices Tax Act, (CGST), 2017 at Police Station Civil Lines, Sirsa, District Sirsa. 2. The FIR in the present case was registered on the basis of the complaint moved by Vijender Singh Excis...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUPER TECH FORGINGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 20, 2024)

ORDER SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. AG, Punjab, accepts notice for the respondents - revenue. 3. Both the counsel are ad idem that the issue involved in the present petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in CWP No. 18967 of 2020 (O&M) & other connected cases, titled as, “Tecnimont Spa India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another”, decided on 10.12.2024, wherein, we ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. 1. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is a unit of SKN Group. It is authorized by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board and the State Government of Haryana which distribute CNG and PNG in Gurugram. It is duly registered under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, ‘the Excise Act’). The Superintendent has requisitioned records vide letter dated 08.02.2024 for the period April 2018 to ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)