Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
Court - HC ✔

  9,146 Results

ORDER The Court made the following Order : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) As both these writ petitions raise same issues, they are being disposed of by way of this common order. 2. Heard Sri Raghavan Rambhadran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2 and Sri Y.V. Anil Kumar, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.3. 3. The p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. Present petition has been filed challenging an order dated 19.12.2024 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed without granting an opportunity of hearing as well as the order dated 07.08.2021 passed under Section 74 of GST Act, which too was dismissed wit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANIL KUMAR SINGH vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Apr 18, 2025)

CAV JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “i. For the issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of certiorari to quash the Demand cum show cause notice bearing no. C.No. V(44)01/SCN/Pur. Div/Anil Kumar Singh/2022/506 dated 19.04.2022 (Annexure P/2) issued by the Respondent Assistant Commissioner whereby and where under the Petitione...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANTOSH KUMAR SAH vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Calcutta High Court | Apr 17, 2025)

JUDGMENT PER BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY, J: 1. This is an application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973/483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 filed by the petitioner who is in custody in connection with CR Case No. 530 of 2025 dated 31-03-2025 under Sections 132 (1) (c) read with 132 (5) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017, pending before the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Siliguri Darjeeling. 2. It is the contention of the peti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 8th April, 2024 vide which a demand of Rs. 9,10,792/- has been raised against the Petitioner. The said order has been passed pursuant to show cause notice (SCN) dated 3rd December, 2023. The ground on which it was issued was that the annual returns in GSTR-9 for the year 2018 were not filed by the Petitioner. The impugned order is challeng...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner-M/s Prince Diamond Jewellers Private Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ assailing the impugned order dated 14th December 2023 (hereinafter, ‘impugned order’) passed by the Respondent No. 1. The impugned order was passed pursuant to a show cause notice dated 24th Sept...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 19186/2025 (seeking modification of order dated 12.09.2024) 2. The present application has been filed by the Petitioner- Singhal Singh Rawat under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 inter alia seeking modification of order dated 12th September, 2024. 3. By the present application, an extension is sought by the Petitioner for filing of the response to a show cause notice dated 17th November, 2022 (herei...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition inter alia challenges the Order dated 1st February 2025 to the extent it has been issued to the Petitioners. By the impugned Order, a penalty of approx. Rs.133 crores has been demanded from the three Petitioners before us. Petitioner No.1 is the Chief Financial Officer of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, Petitioner No. 2 is the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the said M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited and Petitioner No. 3 is the Joint Managing...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHYAM UDYOG vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Apr 16, 2025)

P. C. 1. The above Writ Petition has been placed on board seeking certain amendments as per the draft amendment tendered to the Court. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and pursuing the amendment sought, we find that the amendments are sought at the preadmission stage and therefore, there can be no impediment in allowing the amendment. This is more so because the nature of the Petition does not change in any way by allowing the aforesaid amendment. In these circumstances, t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present writ petition filed by the Petitioner-M/s Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt. Ltd. under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, assailing the impugned Order-in-Original bearing no. 35/ADC/D.N./BHAVAN MEENA/2024 dated 06th January, 2025 (incorrectly mentioned as 06th January, 2024) followed by the Form GST DRC-07 summary bearing reference no. ZD070125035322W dated 25th January, 2025....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)