Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

VISHWA JEET VERMA vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Nov 16, 2021)

Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Sudarshan Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3 and perused the record. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. According to the prosecution version, on 29.09.2021 searches were conducted by the officers of Directorate General of Goods & Ser...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRAGATI ENGINEERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Nov 15, 2021)

1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the following reliefs: “a) issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ/Direction/Orders to the respondents to remove the anomaly/carry out amendment/modifications in respondent's orders issued vide orders/notice for inviting tender bearing 54(2) Mg CED/ 2020/ 48H) dated 22.01.2021, No. 23 (191) EE(E)V AGT/ CPWD/ 2020-21 dated 02.02.2021 and 54(2)2021/EE(E)-Hyd/AB/186 Dated 02.02.2021 (An...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manu Ghildyal, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. 2. By means of the present petition, challenge has been raised to the ex-parte adjudication order dated 07.08.2021 passed by Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Sector-I, Shajahanpur (hereinafter referred to as the 'Deputy Commissioner), purportedly in exercise of powers vested under section 74 (9) of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.J.Vasu, learned Junior Panel Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's credit was attached by the respondents on 14.09.2020. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has sent two representations dated 09.06.2021 and 04.10.2021 to the respondents. But it has not effected any response from the respondents. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that such attachme...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.11.2020 issued in Form GST MOV-11 whereby the vehicle being registration No.HR 55 S 1171 belonging to the petitioner has been confiscated and penalty has been imposed. Further challenge is to the order dated 28.06.2021 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner under Section 107 of...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “(i) For consequential writ or order for quashing of summary of order issued in Form GST DRC-07 dated 02.03.2020 by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Patna Central Circle, Patna the Respondent No. 5 under Section 75 of the GST Act whereby the interest has been imposed on gross amount without deducting the Input Tax Credit which is already paid by the petitioner and in utter violation ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KASHMIR KUMAR AGRAWAL vs. STATE OF ODISHA


(Orissa High Court | Nov 15, 2021)

Heard Mr. R.P. Kar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sunil Kumar Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for CT & GST.   2. The petitioner is in custody since 17.08.2020 in connection with 2(c)CC Case No. 38/2020 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Panposh corresponding to GST and CT Enforcement Unit, Rourkela Case No. 1/2020- 2021 for the alleged commission of offence punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act,2017(hereinafter ref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Nov 12, 2021)

Subject: M/s NBCC (INDIA) Limited, Plot No. G/1, NBCC Imperia, New Govt. Colony, Bhubaneswar, Odisha-751017 (herein after referred to as the 'Applicant') having a GSTIN : 21AAACN3053B1ZC, is a company filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. Note: The applicant or jurisdictional officer, if aggrieved by the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANTARA PURUKUL SENIOR LIVING LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Nov 12, 2021)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods 2017 & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act} and the rules made there under filed by M/s Antara Purukul Senior Living Limited having its registered office at Guniyal Gaon, P.O.: Sinola, Dehradun - 248009, Uttarakhand (herein after referred to as the “applicant”), a registered Public Limited Company under Companies...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Government Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. It is submitted that the notices and the orders communicated in terms of Section 169 (1) (c & d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are of no consequence, if order was passed in Violation of Principles of Natural Justice. Even if the provisions are silent for personal hearing, the Principles of Natural Justice mandate a personal hearing. It is further submitted that even otherwise, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).