Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

KASTURBA HEALTH SOCIETY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 10, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. KASTURBA HEALTH SOCIETY, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. • Whether the applicant, a Charitable Society having the main object and factually engaged in imparting Medical Education, satisfying ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAHA MUMBAI METRO (M3) OPERATION CORPORATION LIMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 10, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. MAHA MUMBAI METRO (M3) OPERATION CORPORATION LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. (i) Whether GST is applicable on reimbursement of expenses such as salaries, rent, training, staff...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned notice dated 24.01.2019. The impugned notice has been issued on the ground that the petitioner had admittedly transferred goods without the goods accompanying E-way Bill. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the lorry was detained and released on payment for a sum of ₹ 3,52,808/- on 01.02.2019. He further submits that there is no evasion of tax and in any event the fact remains that the E-way bill was ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Sri. Girish Hulmani, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.2. Learned HCGP accepts notice for respondent No.6. In view thereof, there is no requirement of any process fee and furnishing of copies. 2. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking for the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of certiorari, or such other writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari, quashing the decision of respondent No.4 in wrongly closing their grievance ticket (Annexure-...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANNAPOORNA MOTORS vs. THE UNION OF INDIA


(Karnataka High Court | Nov 10, 2021)

1. Sri. Girish Hulmani, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No.6. He files statement of objections. The same is taken on record. The objections have been served on the counsel for the petitioner on 10.11.2021. 2. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking for the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of certiorari, or such other writ, order or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari, to strike down/read down sub-rule 1(A) to Rule 117 of CGST Rules, 17 inserted by Not...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. P.Karthik Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. B.Narasimha Sharma, learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2; Mr. Krishna Swamy for the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India appearing for respondent No.3; and Sri K.Raji Reddy, learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5. 2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has assailed legality and validity of Order-in- Original dated 28.03.2019 passed by respondent No.1 under Section...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CIGFIL RETAIL PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Calcutta High Court | Nov 10, 2021)

Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 8th February, 2021 cancelling its registration under GST under the provisions of Section 29(2) of the State GST Act on the ground that registration in question was obtained by documents void ab initio and that there was no existence of business at the declared place and the impugned order dated 16th April, 2021 rejecting the petitioner’s application for revocation of cancellatio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DAUJI ISPAT PRIVATE LIMITED vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Nov 10, 2021)

1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manu Ghildyal learned counsel for the State Revenue Authority, Sri Krishna Ji Shukla learned counsel for the GSTN and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. Challenge has been raised to the summary order DRC-07 dated 20.7.2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Sector-1 Kasganj, Aligarh. 3. Learned counsel for the Revenue Authority has raised a preliminary objection as to alternative remedy...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AIRBUS GROUP INDIA PVT. LTD


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 9, 2021)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the KGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Cen...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayers: "(i) issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 19.8.2019 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Division-2, Lallitpur i.e. respondent no. 3 (Annexure- no. 2 to the writ petition)as well as impugned order dated 24.3.2021 passed in App...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).