Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,170 Results

1. The dispute in the present writ petition lies in a narrow compass and relates to the rejection of the petitioners claims for budgetary support under a “Scheme of Budgetary Support under Goods and Service Tax” regime on the ground that the claims were made for the period prior to the registration which is impermissible. 2. The writ petitioner is engaged in the manufacture and supply of pharmaceutical products at their unit situated in Sikkim. They seek to challenge four orde...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ACHARYA SHREE MAHASHRAMAN CHATURMAS VYVASTHA SAMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Nov 23, 2021)

1. M/s. Acharya Shree Mahashraman Chaturmas Vyvastha Samiti, 2-3-530, D.V. COLONY, SECUNDERABAD, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500003 (36AAHTA8018M1ZE) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MADHAV COPPER LIMITED vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Nov 23, 2021)

1. This is a petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the provisional attachment order attaching the properties of Madhav Copper Limited under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act’) and under the provisions of Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘GGST Act’). 2. The brief facts are as follows: - 2.1. The petitioner no.1 is a c...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the summons issued to it on various grounds. The primary contention of learned counsel before us is that in response to the first summon served, the petitioner had submitted that it would require two weeks to appear with all the material but without giving any breathing time, further summons were being issued. Notice of motion. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Gagandeep Singh Malhotra, Advocate accepts notice on ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARU NANDA vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 23, 2021)

CRM-38458-2021 This is an application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for impleading applicant/complainant as party i.e. respondent No.2 in the present case. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the applicant/complainant is ordered to be impleaded as respondent No.2. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. CRM-M-32440-2021 This is the first petition for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.21 dated 04.02.2021 un...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOGINENI MOHAN KRISHNA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Nov 22, 2021)

1. M/s. Gogineni Mohan Krishna, Bhadradri, 2-124, Opp: East Gate, Main Road, Sarapaka, Bhadradri – 507 128 Telangana State (36GLNPK9442J1ZD ) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a refere...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHOPAL SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Nov 22, 2021)

1. M/s Bhopal Smart City Development Corporation Limited ((hereinafter referred to as ‘Applicant’), is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 with registrar of Companies, Gwalior and with sole objective of Planning and implementing the “Smart City Project” in Bhopal. It is registered with the GST Authorities in the State of Madhya Pradesh and has been granted Registration No 23AAGCB6537N1ZE. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identica...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROTARY CLUB OF BOMBAY QUEEN CITY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 22, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Rotary Club of Bombay Queen City, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether the activity of the applicant i.e. collecting contributions and spending towards meeting and administrative expenditures ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROTARY CLUB OF NAGPUR VISION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Nov 22, 2021)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Rotary Club of Nagpur Vision, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. The amount collected as membership subscription and admission fees from members by the applicant club to meet out the expenses for ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This common order will dispose of both the writ petitions. 2. We have hard Sri M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, for all the respondents. 3. Grievance of the petitioners in both the writ petitions pertain to alleged inaction of the respondents in permitting the petitioners to rectify the errors made by the petitioners in Transition Form – l (TRAN-l). 4. Be it stated that bot...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).