Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "I. Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned ex-parte order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 under section 74 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition)." 3. Applying the ratio as laid down by the c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MUNNI JENERAL STORE vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 18, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Ms. Vedika Nath, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated April 16, 2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1, Balia for the tax period April 2018 to March 2019, whereby demand has been raised against the present petitioner. 3. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAURYA ALLOYS PVT LTD vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 18, 2024)

ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar matters are pending before this Court wherein challenge has been made to section 16(2)(c) of the GST Act, 2017 which leaves the fate of a bona fide purchaser having paid his tax in hands of the original supplier who may have defaulted in not paying of the taxes. Notice of motion. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of State and seeks time to file reply. May do so, on or before the next date o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. (PER M.S. SONAK, J.) :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The petitioner has pleaded that he was appointed as a nominee/non-executive director of Vistaar Logistic Pvt. Ltd. (“the company”) on 25 February 2016. By letter dated 18 March 2019, he resigned as a director due to personal reasons. On 20 March 2019, the board resolved ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT :-   (PER M. S. SONAK, J.) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the show cause notice bearing No. DGGI/SZU/36-158/2022-23 dated 30 January 2023 (Exhibit-A) issued by the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax Intelligence, Surat Zonal Unit. 3. Mr. Nankani, the learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner, submitted that the Petitioner has entered into a licence agreement for the manufacture and sale of beer with...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) CM-20414-CWP-2024 Application for placing on record short reply on behalf of respondents along with Annexure R-1/1 is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Registry to place the same at appropriate place. Main case 1. The GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondents vide order dated 20.03.2023 solely on the ground that when the Inspector reached the place of office, though the nameplate mentioned the nam...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SURESH CHAND MEENA vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 17, 2024)

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 07 04.04.2024 Anti-Corruption Bureau, Faridabad 7 of PC Act (Section 13 (1) (B) read with section 13(2) of PC Act and 201 IPC, 1860 added later on) 1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Cour...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the impugned orders dated 24.08.2024 and 30.08.2024 on the premise that the same are made in gross violation of procedure contemplated under the GST Act and they are also made in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner is a proprietary concern and is engaged in the business of supply of gas cylinders. The petitioner is registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period 2019-20, the petitioner had filed...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.08.2024 on the premise that the same is not a speaking order and thus in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner is a partnership firm and engaged in the business of running a supermarket. The petitioner is registered under the TNGST/CGST Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner had filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on examination of the informati...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging the denial of input tax credit on the basis of Section 16(2)(c) and Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Acts. 2. Petitioner contends that if the directions issued by this Court in M. Trade Links V. Union of India (2024 KLT Online 1624) are extended to him, he will be entitled to claim input tax credit denied as per Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Acts. 3. In so far as the claim for input tax credit, which has been denied to the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)