Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order in Ref.No.ZD330824253921B dated 28.08.2024, passed by the respondent on the premise that the same was made in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is engaged in the business of supplying services for transport agency and is registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period of 2019-20, the petitioner had filed the returns...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK The petitioner has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : 7.1 That, Quashing of Impugned Notice: Kindly Quash the demand notice dated 07/11/2024 issued by the Assistant Commissioner, State Commercial Tax Circle, Ashoknagar, M.P., for non-payment of GST on royalty payments for the period 2018-19 to 2024-25. 7.2 Declaration on GST Applicability: Kindly declare that GST is not applicable o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order of demand of tax and penalty in Form GST MOV-09 dated 21.04.2022 (Order No.40/2022-23/ADJ) passed by the respondent herein. 3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner had placed a purchase order with its supplier viz., Tvl.NAV DURGA STEEL ZONE located at Ernavoor, Chennai – 600 057 for supply of g...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.08.2024, on the limited ground that the impugned order traverses beyond the show cause notice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a painting contractor (works contract) and is registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period of 2019-20, the petitioner has filed the returns and paid appropriate taxes. However, on verification of the returns filed by ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 09.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the GST Act as well as the order dated 22.10.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed as being beyond limitation. 3. Attacking the order dated 09.12.2023, the submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that the s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PC:- 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. Heard Mr. Jas Sanghavi, the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 3. This matter was circulated citing extreme urgency because the Petitioner’s bank account had been frozen yesterday. 4. The bank account has been frozen, given the five orders-in-original, all dated 31 May 2024, collectively demanding ITC of Rs.523.12 crores, interest, and penalty. These Orders are appealable, and we are not satisfied with the usual r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SURUCHI SHARMA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 18, 2024)

ORDER 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Sr. Standing Counsel, accepts notice for the respondents - revenue. 3. Both the counsel are ad idem that the issue involved in the present petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in CWP No. 18967 of 2020 (O&M) & other connected cases, titled as, “Tecnimont Spa India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another”, decided on 10.12.2024, wherein, we have held as under: “1. The issue raised in th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order in GSTIN:33ARSPR9455K1ZU/2022-2023 dated 19.08.2024, passed by the 1st respondent on the premise that the same was made in violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a service provider and is registered under the GST Act. During the relevant period of 2022-23, the petitioner has filed the returns and paid appropriate taxes. While ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner was served with an assessment order vide Reference No.DIN3716112261960, dated 16.11.2022, passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”] for the periods July, 2017 to September, 2017. This assessment order of the 1st respondent has been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition. 2. This assessment order vide Reference No.DIN3716112261960, is challenged by the petitioner, on various ground...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi with learned advocate Ms. Khyati Chugh for the petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 4321 of 2023, learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the petitioner in Special Civil Application No. 22598 of 2022 and learned advocate Mr. Chirayu Mehta for the respondents No. 1 to 6. 2. At the outset, learned advocates for the respective parties submitted that the issue which has ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)