Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

DELTATECH GAMING LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Dec 20, 2024)

1. Mr. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that on 15th February, 2024 the petitioner made a representation before the Additional Assistant Director, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Kolkata and the Joint/Additional Commissioner, CGST & CX Kolkata North Commissionerate for handing over the relied upon documents which were used for preparing the show cause notice but till date the documents which were relied upon are not issued to...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. (ORAL) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 74953/2024 (exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 17637/2024 & CM APPL. 74952/2024 (stay) 3. The present petition, inter alia, challenges the impugned order dated 31st August, 2024 passed by the Sales Tax Officer, Class-II, Ward 202,203 and 205, Zone-11, Delhi which arises out of Show Cause Notice dated 15th May, 2024. The presen...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHVA ELECTROTECH LTD vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 20, 2024)

ORDER HON’BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:- “A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure No.1) passed by respondent no.2 B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. 1. The petitioner is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and is a unit of SKN Group. It is authorized by the Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board and the State Government of Haryana which distribute CNG and PNG in Gurugram. It is duly registered under the provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (for short, ‘the Excise Act’). The Superintendent has requisitioned records vide letter dated 08.02.2024 for the period April 2018 to ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The contentions raised in the present writ petitions on limitation are answered in C.W.J.C. No. 4180 of 2024 and analogous cases, M/s Barhonia Engicon Private Limited v. The Union of India and Ors. vide judgment dated 27.11.2024, against the petitioner. 2. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the assessment orders impugned have been passed without granting a personal hearing under Section 75(4) of the GST enactments, in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. 2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act"). 3. However, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have preferred an appeal after payment of the whole amount of disputed tax. So the question of predeposit at the time of filing of the appeal does not arise. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have failed to submit one application for condonation of delay while filing an appeal and the appellate authority has passed an order rejecting the appeal of the petitioners on the ground of delay. Learn...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOOD MORNING FLOUR MILLS vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 19, 2024)

ORDER SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. Notice of motion. 2. Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Addl. A.G., accepts notice for the respondents. 3. Both the counsel are ad idem that the issue involved in the present petition stands finally adjudicated by this Court in CWP No. 18967 of 2020 (O&M), titled as,“Tecnimont Spa India Project Office vs. State of Punjab and another”, decided on 10.12.2024, wherein, we have held as under: “1. The issue raised in the present...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.08.2024 on the limited ground that the impugned order proceeds on the basis that no reply was filed overlooking the fact that the petitioner had in fact filed its reply to the show cause notice vide letter dated 17.08.2024. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is engaged in the business of providing event management services to varied client across India and is ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The case of the petitioner is that the consolidated amount even under the show cause notice relates to various invoice bills. Hence, if the break-up is taken, e-way bills could be exempted. Since all the invoices are less than Rs. 1 Lakh, the same are exempted from e-way bills. 2. However, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that if the petitioner had produced those copies of invoices to substantiate that they are all below Rs. 1,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)