Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

RAJESH MITTAL vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Feb 9, 2022)

CRM-4080-2022 & CRMs-3473, 631 & 7449-2021 As prayed for, applications are allowed. CRM-M-42233-2020 The present petition filed by the petitioner is for the grant of regular bail in complaint case No.215 dated 30.08.2019 registered under Section 132 of Haryana Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panipat. Learned counsel for the petitioner...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DAULATRAM ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT. LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Feb 8, 2022)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s DAULAT RAM ENGINEERING SERVICES PVT LIMITED, MANDIDEEP (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. K. A. S. V. Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Y. N. Vivekananda, learned Government Pleader, Commercial Tax, for the respondents no.1 and 2; Mr. Suresh Kumar Routhu, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent no.4 and Mr. N. Harinath, learned Assistant Solicitor General for the respondent no.3. 2. The petitioner has moved the Court, for the following relief: “….to issue any order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of M...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAPIL SONS (RAJENDRA KUMAR BAHETI)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 8, 2022)

The present application has been filed Under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. KAPIL SONS, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whether the activity to be carried by the applicant shall be classified as supply of goods or services or a composite supply of 'works' contract...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
C.M.Nos.6909-6910/2022 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) No.2408/2022 & C.M.No.6908/2022 1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the letter dated 27th November, 2020, whereby the Respondent has directed attachment of the immovable properties and bank accounts of the Petitioner. Petitioner also seeks a direction to the R...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this writ petition, the solitary question which arises for consideration is whether the service provided by petitioner i.e., leasing of residential premises as hostel to students and working professionals is covered under Entry 13 of Notification No.9/2017 dated 28.09.2017 namely 'Services by way of renting of residential dwelling for use as residence' issued under Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). FACTUAL BACK...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JALANDHAR STEEL vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Feb 7, 2022)

Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayer: a) For issuance of an appropriate writ or writs in the nature of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside the show Cause Notice issued under reference no. 131 dated 31.07.2020 (Annexure-5) u/s 73 (1) and Rule 142(1) of the GST Act, wherein the respondent no. 7, at the stage of show cause notice itself, has already pre-judged and pre-decided the entire issue and has even passed o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DANANJAY SINGH vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | Feb 5, 2022)

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of file No.DGGI/INV/MISC/433/2021-GR-H-O/O ADG-DGGI-ZU-JAIPUR Registered At Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Jaipur Zonal Unit, Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 132 (1) (B) (H) (I) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been wrongly implicated in this case. He is behind the bars since 24.10.2021. Learned cou...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By this common order, all the three Writ Petitions are being disposed. 2. The petitioners have challenged the impugned assessment order dated 19.03.2021 in W.P.No.27651 of 2021 and the impugned assessment order dated 30.12.2020 in W.P.No.27654 of 2021 and the impugned assessment order dated 10.03.2021 in W.P.No.27657 of 2021. The petitioners have also challenged the impugned recovery proceedings issued consequent to the assessment orders. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners sub...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents. 3. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order of detention in Form GST MOV-06 dated 31.01.2022. By the impugned order of detention issued under Section 129(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 201...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).