Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

BODAL CHEMICALS LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 11, 2022)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, thereby directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to furnish, if necessary manually, GSTR-6 Return with details of ISD credit of ₹ 20,52,989/-; (B) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any oth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule. Mr.Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 waives service. Ms.Solunke, learned AGP for the respondent no.4 waives service. By consent of parties, the petition is heard finally. 2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks an order and direction against the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to allow the petitioner to rectify inadvertent mistake in mentioning incorrect place of supply 33 - Tamil Nadu in stead of 34 &ndash...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition, B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition, C. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent authorities to immediately sanction the refund of IGST aggregating to ₹ 1,00,424/- paid in regard to the goods expor...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule. Mr.Bangur, learned counsel for the respondents waives service. By consent of parties, the writ petition is heard finally. 2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a declaration that the Rule 90(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 is ultra vires the Constitution of India and shall be struck down. The petitioner also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to withdraw the impugned ci...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr. Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to delete the respondent nos.6 and 7 in the cause title. Leave to amend is granted. The amendment to be carried out within one week from today. Re-verification is dispensed with. 2. Rule. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 5 waives service. Ms.Solunke, learned AGP for the respondent no.4 waives service. By consent of parties, the petition is heard finally.   3. By this petition filed under Article 2...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent. 3. The petitioner is a public limited company. It is engaged in infrastructure development and it contends that it has presence in various states of India, including the State of Maharashtra. 4. The petitioner company was registered under the provisions of erstwhile State Sales Tax Act and after the Sales Tax was subsumed into the Goods and Service Tax vide the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (&l...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records leading to the issuance of GSTIN:33AALCS4118F1ZJ dated 14.12.2021 passed by the respondent herein and quash the same, and further direct the Respondent to withdraw the tax demand made vide assessment order dated 11.11.2020 or refund the eligible credit of tax to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is a civil works contractor. He had secured registration under the erstwhile Tamil Nadu Value Added T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiori, quashing the impugned order GSTIN: 33CDVPR5729K1ZP/2017-2018, 33CDVPR5729K1ZP/2019-2020 and 33CDVPR5729K1ZP/2018-2019 respectively dated 05.08.2021 passed by the first respondent on the grounds of violation of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner is a sole proprietary concern, they engaged in the business of iron and steel scrap. The petitioner is registered under GST with GSTIN Nos: 33CDVPR5729K1ZP/2017-2018, 33CDVPR5729...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:- “26(a) To issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No.2 to give effect to the order in Appeal passed by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and in case there is any technical difficulty being faced then direction for Respondent no.3 to provide technical assistance in giving effect to th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. CM APPL.7151/2022 1. Present application has been filed on behalf of the Respondents seeking vacation of the interim order dated 26th July, 2019 passed by this Court in the present matter, whereby further audit proceedings had been stayed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the issue raised in the present petition is no longer res integra, as it stands decided by this Court in favour of the Respondents i...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).