Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

EZZY ELECTRICALS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 16, 2022)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “A This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to upload Form GST ITC-01 on the online portal for claiming input tax credit under Section 18(1)(c) of the GST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARAFA TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 16, 2022)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside confiscation notice in Form GST MOV 10 (annexed at Annexure-A) (B) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. N Hawelia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S C Keyal, learned Standing Counsel for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner M/S Veteran Facility Management Services Pvt. Ltd. is a partnership firm engaged in the business of providing security services. The petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017 bearing GSTIN No. 18AAECV2508H1ZD. Under the law the petitioner firm is required to file monthly return under the GST as per the Form GSTR-1. A s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIJAY MAMGAIN vs. THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Feb 15, 2022)

1. By this petition the petitioner has challenged the action of the respondents in not releasing the conveyance even though he had paid the fine prescribed under Section 130 (2) proviso of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act'). 2. It is his contention that the scheme of Section 130 of the Act makes it clear that the owner of the goods and the owner of the conveyance are two separate entities and the liability of one can not be foisted upon the other. Secti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NICO TILES vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Feb 15, 2022)

Petitioner challenges a series of monthly assessment orders issued under section 62 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, 'the Act'). As per the impugned orders of assessment, produced as Ext.P3 and Ext.P3(a) to Ext.P3(r), it was stated that petitioner having failed to furnish returns in spite of notice under section 46 of the Act, assessments have been carried out for the respective periods. 2. The tax periods involved in Ext.P3 and Ext.P3(a) to Ext.P3(r) ar...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petitioner is alleged to commit an offence constituted under Section 132(1)(b)(c) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. In pursuance to the afore offence becoming allegedly committed by the applicant, he became arrested, on 23.10.2021. 2. The petitioner was serving as a chartered accountant, with two proprietorship concerns, respectively with the name, and, style of M/s Lalji Enterprises, and, M/s Hemu Overseas. He is alleged by the prosecution to facilitate, through his draw...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner seeks for a direction to dispose of Ext.P6 application and also to permit the petitioner to revise the returns as sought for in Ext.P6. 2. Petitioner is a registered dealer under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. In the returns filed for the months of January and March, 2018; petitioner subsequently realized that a mistake had occurred, while uploading the returns. The values were incorrectly shown as zero in the returns and, according to the petitioner, the same arose on ac...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. N Hawelia, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S C Keyal, learned Standing Counsel for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner M/S Veteran Security Services is a partnership firm engaged in the business of providing security services. The petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017 bearing GSTIN No. 18AAGFV1352A2ZI. Under the law the petitioner firm is required to file monthly return under the GST as per the Form GSTR-1. A stand is taken that th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. K. Kurmi, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner along with Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari and Ms. Sidhi Jalan, Advocates. 2. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 3. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs: - a. For setting aside the order in Appeal dated 03.2.2020 (Annexure-1) passed by the appellate authority, i.e. the Respondent No.2. b. For setting aside the order in Original dated 25.1.20...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TARUN KUMAR vs. STATE OF PUNJAB


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Feb 14, 2022)

1. The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in a case registered vide FIR No. 30 dated 13.3.2021 under Sections 406, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471/120-B IPC at Police Station Punjab Agriculture University (PAU) Ludhiana, District Ludhiana. 2. The FIR was registered at the instance of Principal Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate, Ludhiana wherein it is alleged that three firms namely M/s La Mode Fashions, M/s Decent Fashions and M/s Murari Enterprises indulged in preparing fa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).