Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Feb 18, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Sterlite Technologies Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. What is the rate of tax applicable to the supplies made under the contract? At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the p...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MESSERS FILATEX INDIA LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 18, 2022)

1. Since the issues raised in both the writ applications are the same and the parties are also the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.13491 of 2021 is treated as the lead matter. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Petitioners, who are in custody since 21.12.2020, have filed the instant bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. corresponding to 2(C)CC Case No.03 of 2020 pending in the court of the Learned J.M.F.C(R), Cuttack for commission of offences under Sections 132(1) (c), 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(i) of the OGST Act, 2017. Prior to the instant application, the Petitioners had approached the learned District and Sessions Judge, Cuttack, vide Bail Application No. 11023 of 2020 which wa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IPCA LABORATORIES LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER


(Gujarat High Court | Feb 18, 2022)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, ordering and directing the respondents themselves, their officers and subordinates to act upon or grant the petitioner refund of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OSWAL INDUSTRIES LTD., (M/S. NIMBA NATURE CURE VIL..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Feb 17, 2022)

The appellant M/s. Oswal Industries Limited (M/s. Nimba Nature Cure Village), has submitted that they are engaged in providing Naturopathy treatment since last 6 years. It is one of the largest Naturopathy Centers in India, and offers AYUSH approved treatments of Naturopathy, Ayurveda, Yoga including Meditation, Physiotherapy and special Therapy. It also provides Advanced Hydrotherapy and Heat Treatment like Stone Therapy. As it functions as an integrated Health Care Center, the regimen deman...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, seeking to modify the conditional order passed in Crl.M.P.No.11 of 2022 dated 07.02.2022 by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.I Court), Egmore, Chennai that the petitioner shall execute a bond of ₹ 50,00,000/- by depositing documents of property worth ₹ 50,00,000/- with two sureties for a sum of ₹ 5,00,000/- each and out of the sureties, one of the surety to be a Government Employee and another blood suret...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Since the issue raised in these writ petitions is one and the same, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both sides, both the cases were heard together and are disposed of by this common order. 2. These petitioners have registered under 'Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017' [in short 'TNGST Act'] with the respondent and they are doing business. 3. While so, a search under Section 67 of the TNGST Act was conducted on 24.02.2021 at the premises o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant – a Proprietory concern through its Proprietor has prayed for the following reliefs:- 8(A) to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing and setting aside the impugned orders (Annexure-A) and further be pleased to direct respondent to release property of petitioner attached vio attachment order dated 30.07.2019 (Annexu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Sumeet Gadodia and learned counsel for the respondents CGST Mr. P.A.S. Pati. 2. Interest amounting to ₹ 83,96,873/- on the alleged ground of delay in furnishing GSTR-3B return for the period July 2017 to December 2019 has been levied by the impugned letter dated 28th February 2020 / 2nd March 2020 issued by the respondent no.2 Assistant Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, Ranchi. The same has been challenged on the specific ground that sin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ACHAMPET SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 16, 2022)

1. M/s. Achampet Solar Private Limited, 8-2-610/68/1,2,3, 5th Floor, Accord Blu, Road NO 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500034 (36AANCA8941N1ZX) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).