Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

Petitioner is a transporter operating under a valid GST registration number. It was entrusted with the transportation of stainless steel coils and plates from Mumbai to Bengaluru. A lorry belonging to the petitioner was carrying four consignments out of which two consignments had to be delivered at Peenya Industrial area at Peenya, one consignment at new Kalasipalyam and another consignment at S.P.Road cross, Bengaluru. The driver of the lorry had to move towards Peenya Industrial Area from D....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The written instruction filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State. The dispute being raised in the present writ petition is with regard to the detention order passed under Section 129(1) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 dated 17.5.2022 and the order dated 21.5.2022 passed under Section 129(3) of the Act, 2017. The dispute being raised herein is with regard to the seizure of goods as also....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING AND OTHERS vs. L'OREAL INDIA PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 23, 2022)

The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as DGAP) has submitted a report dated 28.8.2020 under Rule 133(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules) in the matter relating to M/s L'Oreal India Pvt. Ltd., A-Wing, 8th Floor, Marathon Futurex, N.M. Joshi Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai -400013 (hereinafter referred to as “Respondent” also). The aforesaid report dated 28.8.2020 was submitted by DGAP purs....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DUBAI CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 23, 2022)

1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same, provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [herei....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide Interim Order No. 28/2020 dated 27.11.2020 in this matter had passed the following order:- “21. We have carefully considered the Report furnished by the DGAP, the submissions made by the Respondent and the other material placed on record. On examining the various submissions, the observations of this Authority are as follows:- a) The DGAP, in Para 16 of his report, has stated that the Respondent had entered into an....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The Present Report dated 31.03.2021 had been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. 2. The DGAP vide the above said Report dated 31.03.2021 has inter-alia stated the following:- i. The Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received 4 Applications under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, filed by Applicant No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 alleging pr....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Jun 21, 2022)

At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central GST Act, 2017 and of Odisha GST Act, 2017 are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the OGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Central Goods and Service tax Act, 2017 and Orissa Goods & Services Tax Act 2....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ULCCS CALICUT CITY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PRIV..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Kerala | Jun 21, 2022)

1. M/ s. ULCCS Calicut City infrastructure Development Private Ltd (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) was formed and registered for the execution of the work of Design, Engineering, Finance, Procurement, Construction, Operation and maintenance of roads under Phase II (A) of Kozhikode City Road Improvement Project [KCRIP] on Design, Finance, Operate, Maintain and Transfer [DBFOT- Annuity] basis. 2. At the outset, it is clarified that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This intra-Court appeal has been filed by the writ petitioner/appellant challenging the order dated 19th May, 2022 by which the learned Single Judge has declined to grant any interim order in favour of the writ petitioner. The appellant is aggrieved by the communication dated October 22, 2021 blocking electronic credit ledger thereby leaving a negative balance of Rs.1,14,30,608/-. According to the appellant, the reasons cited by the respondent authorities for blocking of the electronic credit....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEDHA SERVO DRIVES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jun 21, 2022)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017(“the Act”, in short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate Authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six months from the date of order. Provided that no rectification which has the e....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).