^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M.S.A. STEEL AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX AND OTHER
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUNITA AGARWAL
VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN

Pet. Counsel

Suyash Agarwal

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	M.S.A. STEEL AND ALLOYS PVT. LTD.
Respondent	ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAX AND OTHER
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Jun 23, 2022
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 845 of 2022
Citation	2022(6) TAXREPLY 5975
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
The written instruction filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.P. Singh Kachhawah, learned Standing Counsel for the State. The dispute being raised in the present writ petition is with regard to the detention order passed under Section 129(1) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 dated 17.5.2022 and the order dated 21.5.2022 passed under Section 129(3) of the Act, 2017. The dispute being raised herein is with regard to the seizure of goods as also the computation of penalty as per Section 129 of the Act, 2017. Against the orders impugned, the petitioner herein has a remedy of filing an appeal under Section 107 of the Act, 2017, which is an exhaustive remedy to address all the grievances of the petitioner. All the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner can very well be considered by the Appellate Authority, in case appeal is filed under the said provision. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the ....