Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

The petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CGST Act’ for short). In the course of its business, the petitioner is said to have executed certain works contract in favour of one Nirmithi Kendra, Bengaluru Rural District, for which it has received consideration. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the said Nirmithi Kendra is a Government concern and hence petitioner is liable to pay....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present report dated 26.02.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e., the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and alleged that the Respondent i.e. M/s MYK Laticrete India Pvt. Ltd, had resorted to profiteering in respect of supply of the products manufactured and sold b....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present report dated 31.12.2020, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017 pursuant to National Anti-Profiteering Authority's (NAA) Interim Order No. 15/2020 dated 20.4.2020 under Rule 133 (4) of the Rules, 2017, which directed as follows:- i. The issues of common input tax credit shall be investigated by the DGAP and a detail....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The instant Report dated 28.08.2020, received on 31.08.2020 has been furbished by Applicant No. 17 i.e. Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules. 2017. The brief facts of the present case, are that a reference was received on 30.08.2018 by the DGAP from the Standing Committee on Antiprofiteering to conduct a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Rules 2017, based on two applications dated 17.072018 and 12.05.2018 fil....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 26.06.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of construction service supplied by t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) vide Interim Order No. 34/2020 dated 11.12.2020 in this matter has given the following order:- i. “It is observed that the above provision of the RERA Act, 2016 makes it mandatory for a real estate developer/promoter to maintain separate bank accounts for each of his projects registered separately under the RERA Act, 2016. In the case of the Respondent, the above provision implies that he was required to maintain four separate escrow....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMESH KUMAR PATODIA vs. CITI BANK NA AND OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jun 24, 2022)

1. The borrower has filed this Writ petition praying for a declaration that the interest component of the Equated Monthly Instalments (for short “EMI”) of the loan granted by the respondent Bank is exempted from levy of Integrated Goods and Service Tax (for short “IGST”) and for a direction upon the Bank and the IGST authorities to refund the IGST collected from the petitioner. 2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition are as follows- Petitioner i....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The impugned proceedings passed by the respondent in DIN: 20220359XO000000E223 dated 14.03.2022, is under challenge in the present Writ Petition. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is running Super Market in the name and style of 'M/s.Janapriyaa' registered with the respondent Department and regularly filing the monthly returns under Goods and Service Tax Act (in short 'GST'). Based on the scrutiny and verification of GSTR-3B returns filed....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRIDHAR vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GST CUDDALORE


(Madras High Court | Jun 23, 2022)

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the sole respondent not to harass the petitioner during the enquiry in connection with the case in GST 33BDWPS3178K1ZP of Kalki Traders. 2. Heard Mr. R.N. Amarnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.P.Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that under the production of summons, the petitioner is forced to give an undertaking to pay the t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this common order, both the petitions are being dealt with. For the purpose of adjudication, the facts are drawn from the petition being Special Civil Application No.11332/2022. 2. The present petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek to challenge the legality and validity of the Order-in-original dated 25.03.2022 along with 2 Summary Orders thereof in Form DRC-07 passed by the respondent No.3 on the ground that the same are in gross violation of the provisions o....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).