^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SRIDHAR vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GST CUDDALORE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

N. SATHISH KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

R.n. Amarnath

Res. Counsel

N.p. Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	SRIDHAR
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT OF GST CUDDALORE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jun 23, 2022
Order No.	Crl. O.P. No.7736 of 2022
Citation	2022(6) TAXREPLY 6152
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the sole respondent not to harass the petitioner during the enquiry in connection with the case in GST 33BDWPS3178K1ZP of Kalki Traders. 2. Heard Mr. R.N. Amarnath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.P.Kumar, learned Special Public Prosecutor for the respondent. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that under the production of summons, the petitioner is forced to give an undertaking to pay the tax of a sum of Rs.29 lakhs, whereas the learned Special Public Prosecutor submitted that despite several opportunities were given, the petitioner has not produced any document to substantiate his case. 4. The term harassment is so subjective which cannot be encapsulated in objective criterion. The petitioner having given a complaint is bound to cooperate with the Police for enquiry. Admittedly, the enquiry is pending. Without cooperating with the Police, they cannot seek such a blanket direc....