Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER 1. Affidavit-of-service is already taken on record. 2. Ms. Matan Chakraborty, learned Advocate appears for the petitioner. 3. Mr. Nabankur Paul, learned State Advocate and 4. Mr. Sumit Kumar, learned State Advocate appear for the State respondents. 5. No affidavit has been filed and exchanged by and between the parties. However, the parties agree to proceed without affidavits and this order is being passed. 6. Referring to a show cause notice dated August 8,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 20.08.2024 relating to the assessment year 2019- 20. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of trading in metal scraps and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period viz., 2019-20, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on examination of the information furnished in GSTR-01, GSTR-2A, GSTR-3B and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Vijay Bishnoi , CJ ) Learned counsel appearing for the respective parties are in agreement that with the amendment of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, particularly by insertion of sub-section (5) in Section 16, the grievance raised by the writ petitioners in this writ petition has been redressed. With coming into force of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, a new sub-section (5) has been inserted in Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017, which reads as under: ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER The present writ petition has been filed challenging the confiscation notice issued by the respondent dated 02.08.2024 under Section 130 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter called as “TNGST Act”). 2. Petitioner's Submissions: 2.1 Mr. Vijay Narayanan, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It operates a jewelle...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1.  The writ petition was moved on 15th January, 2025. On behalf of petitioner Mr. Kar, learned senior advocate had submitted, his client is engaged in, inter alia, manufacture of bricks. Raw materials used are fly ash, sand and cement. It will appear from the project report of his client, percentage use of cement is 15 to 16 percent. 2.  Under challenge is, inter alia, order dated 3rd January, 2025 rejecting his client’s prayer for analysis of the bricks produce...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

OSR CREATION vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 27, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Parth Goswami, holding brief of Shri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State – respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 22.11.2022 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad 6, Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, respondent no. 3 as well as the order dated 9.8.2023 passed by Additional Commissi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER CM APPL. 3650/2025 (EX.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 738/2025 & CM APPL. 3649/2025 (STAY) 1. This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “i. Issue a suitable writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to provide hard/photocopies of the Non-relied upon documents in original form, so as to enable the petitioner to file a detailed and co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER The petitioner is before this Court against the Impugned Order-in-Appeal No. 03/2021 dated 21.01.2020 passed by the 1st respondent Joint Commissioner of GST & CE (Appeals II). 2. By the said Impugned Order-in-Appeal dated 21.01.2021, the 1st respondent has rejected the Appeal No.114/2020/GSTA-II/ADC/CO filed by the petitioner against Order-in-Original Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 20.08.2020 bearing reference: RFD-06 passed by the second respondent. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order in Form GST-REG 06 dated 24.01.2022 vide no. ZA330122085796G. The petitioner's GST registration bearing No. 33ABMFS3434M1ZU has been cancelled. 2. The impugned order precedes a show cause notice dated 16.11.2021, to which the petitioner has also replied on 17.12.2021. The show cause notice in Form GST-REG 17/31 dated 16.12.2021. In the aforesaid show cause notice, it has been stated as under: “Based on ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In these Writ Petitions, the respective petitioners have challenged the Impugned Assessment Orders passed on the dates mentioned below pursuant to Remand Orders passed by this Court in the earlier round of litigations. The details of the Writ Petitions filed by the respective petitioners are as under:- Sl. No W.P.(MD) No. Petitioner Assessment Year Date of Impugne...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)