Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER CM APPL. 5549/2025 (Ex.) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 1115/2025 & CM APPL. 5550/2025 (Stay) 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “A, issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, direction or order thereby, declaring the Circular No. 3/3/2017-GST dated 05.07.2017 and Circular No. 31/05/2018-GST dated 09.2.2018 as ultra vires the provisions of the Central G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NABROS PHARMA PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jan 29, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Aayush Pankaj Tiwari and Sri R. K. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 25.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of GST Act as well as the order dated 10.12.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that no opportunity of hearing was granted wh...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRIBA NIRMAN COMPANY vs. THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) & OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Jan 29, 2025)

ORDER PER: (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) Heard Sri V. Raghu Ram, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri Anil Bezawada, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. Santi Chandra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for the 4th respondent. 2. The facts in the present case, as stated by the petitioner, are as follows: a) The petitioner is a partnership firm, established in J...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 19.08.2024 passed by the respondent relating to the assessment year 2019-20. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is engaged in the retail and wholesale of high-quality optical products including prescription eyewear, sunglasses, contact lenses and vision care accessories etc., and is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner, stated to be engaged in providing various financial services, has filed the captioned writ petition seeking to challenge Ext.P4 order issued by the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Kerala, under the provisions of the CGST/SGST, Act, 2017. 2. The petitioner states that as on 30.06.2017, it had a stock of computers, laptops etc., purchased from within the State of Kerala, paying the tax due under the provisions of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STS-KEC (JV) vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Jan 28, 2025)

COMMON ORDER This batch of five Writ Petitions are filed challenging the impugned orders in Form GST DRC-07 dated 12.12.2023, for the assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23, whereby the petitioner's claim for concessional rate of 12% on works contract services of original works executed pursuant to a contract entered with Tvl. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'RVNL') was rejected, instead the impugned order's levies tax at 18%. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P1 show cause notice apart from seeking a direction to pass separate orders for the various financial years and also to grant sufficient time for furnishing a reply for financial years 2018- 2019 to 2023-2024 and provide an opportunity for cross examination. 2. I have heard Sri. K.S. Hariharan Nair, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Smt. Jasmin M.M., the learned Government Pleader. 3. As per Ext.P1 show cause notice dated 29.07.20...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 23.05.2024 relating to the assessment year 2019-20. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of Groceries, Provisions and General Goods and is registered under Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner had filed its return and paid appropriate taxes. However, during the scrutiny of the petitioner's monthly return, the following defects were noti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) Heard Mr. D.V. Pathy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Sadashiv Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K.N. Singh, learned Additional Solicitor General assisted by Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel, CGST & CX for the respondents. 2. This writ application has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- i) the order dated 02.01.2024 (as contained in Annexure – P2) pa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 16.08.2024 on the premise that the petitioner had not submitted its reply when, in fact, the petitioner had submitted its reply on 18.10.2023 in response to the notice in DRC-01 dated 13.07.2023. It was thus submitted that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind to the material on record. 2. The petitioner is a civil works contractor. The petitioner is registere...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)