Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,131 Results

1. The present writ application has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner under the WBGST Act, 2017, effected vide notice dated 17th March 2021. 2. It is the petitioner’s case that originally a show cause notice for cancellation of registration of the certificate issued under the WBGST Act was issued on 30th April 2020. The same was served on the petitioner vide an e-mail communication. The ground for issuance of show cause w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated April 6, 2023 passed by the respondent No.2/Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad, Unit, Fatehpur and the order dated May 16, 2023 passed by the respondent No.1/Additional Commissioner, Grade-2, (Appeal), Judicial Division-Third, State Tax, Prayagraj. 2. I have heard Mr. Aditya Pandey, counsel appearing on...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

YASH BUILDING MATERIAL vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 23, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF,J. 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner has challenged the order dated July 7, 2021 passed by respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner, Sector- 6, Muzaffarnagar and the order passed in appeal dated August 31, 2022 by respondent No.2/Additional Commissioner, Grad...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LD GOYAL STEELS PVT LTD vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 23, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF,J. 1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order imposing penalty dated October 28, 2022 and the order in Appeal dated March 5, 2024. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the e-in...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by an ex party order passed by the appellate authority dated December 7, 2023. 3. The grounds of challenge are that the quantification of liability...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MRM CONSTRUCTION vs. STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Apr 22, 2024)

COMMON ORDER In these three writ petitions, separate orders dated 07.06.2023 are challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand. The petitioner states that he is a civil works contractor undertaking constructions work. It is further asserted that the petitioner was allotted to the Central GST authorities, but that proceedings were initiated by the State GST authorities. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the b...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. S. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the CT & GST Department; Mr. P.K. Parhi, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India appearing for Opposite Party No.7 and Mr. A. Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the Opposite Party No.6. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the circular no.34/8/2018-GST dated 01.03.2018 under Annexure-7 as well as the n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to allow the application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of its GST registration. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent. 3. With the consent of parties, petition is taken up for final disposal. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has closed his business and has applied for cancellation of registration on 22.01.2024, however, th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 25.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“the Act”], whereby a show cause notice dated 21.09.2023 issued by the Sales Tax Officer, Class-II has been adjudicated and a demand of Rs. 15,53,240/- created against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was not aware of the said show cause notice and as such, could not file resp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By these two writ petitions, show cause notices relating to the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration and tax proposals for the tax period 2018-19 are challenged. 2. On perusal of the impugned show cause notices, it is evident that such show cause notice pertains to alleged contravention of specific provisions of applicable GST statutes. Since the challenge is to show cause notices, I am not inclined to exercise discretionary jurisdiction except to the lim...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


13
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).