^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MRM CONSTRUCTION vs. STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

C. Baktha Siromoni

Res. Counsel

T.n.c. Kaushik

Petitioner / Applicant	MRM CONSTRUCTION
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Apr 22, 2024
Order No.	W. P. Nos. 4150, 1747 & 4359 of 2024, W. M. P. Nos. 4691, 1795, 1797, 4512, 4693 & 4514 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10882
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
COMMON ORDER In these three writ petitions, separate orders dated 07.06.2023 are challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand. The petitioner states that he is a civil works contractor undertaking constructions work. It is further asserted that the petitioner was allotted to the Central GST authorities, but that proceedings were initiated by the State GST authorities. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bank account of the petitioner was attached pursuant to orders impugned herein and that the petitioner is put to great hardship because the petitioner is unable to discharge payment obligations, including salary payment obligations. On instructions, he submits that the petitioner agrees to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each order. 3. Mr. T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, appears on behalf of the first and second respondents and Mr. A.V.Radhakrishnan, l....