^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DINESH KUMAR VARMA vs. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 93 ZONE 8 DELHI
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SANJEEV SACHDEVA
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Pet. Counsel

Ajit Kumar Jha

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	DINESH KUMAR VARMA
Respondent	SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 93 ZONE 8 DELHI
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Apr 22, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 5487/2024 & CM APPL. 22593/2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10879
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 73

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 25.12.2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [“the Act”], whereby a show cause notice dated 21.09.2023 issued by the Sales Tax Officer, Class-II has been adjudicated and a demand of Rs. 15,53,240/- created against the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was not aware of the said show cause notice and as such, could not file response thereto. He further submits that petitioner has become aware of another order dated 17.12.2023, whereby another show cause notice dated 24.09.2023 for the same tax period i.e. July 2017 to March 2018 has been adjudicated and a demand of the exact same amount created against the petitioner. 3. Perusal of the order dated 25.12.2023 passed on show cause notice dated 21.09.2023 and order dated 17.12.2023 passed on show cause notice dated 24.09.2023 show that both the show cause notices and ....