Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

COMMON ORDER The writ petition in WP.No.14937 of 2021 has been filed challenging the order passed by the respondent dated 17.11.2020 thereby rejected the request made by the petitioner seeking reimbursement of GST paid by the petitioner. The other writ petitions have been filed for direction to the respective respondents to reimburse the GST paid along with appropriate interest and penalty by the respective petitioners . 2. The petitioners are the suppliers of works contract service a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Challenging the order passed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Although, the said Act provides for an appellate forum, however since the Appellate Tribunal under Section 112 of the said Act is yet to be constituted, the present writ petition had been entertained. 3. The matter pertains to a challenge to an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI) Heard Sri S. Suri Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Shreyas Reddy, learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. By means of this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 03.04.2023 for cancellation of the petitioner’s registration of the GST, as also the order dated 16.06.2023 by which the petitioner’s application for ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER The petitioner is seeking to issue the writ in the nature of certiorari to quash Annexure–D dated 01.10.2021 and Annexure-G dated 30.11.2021 passed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2. 2. Heard learned counsel Sri. Narayan G. Rasalkar, for petitioner and Smt. Kirtilata R. Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner is the partnership firm carrying on its business and registered under Goods...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Bipin Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has assailed the order dated January 15, 2018 passed by respondent no.3/Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, (Mobile Squad), Unit-II, Chandauli as well as the order dated March 27, 2019 passed by the respondent ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANGEETA JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 22, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated December 12, 2022 passed by the respondent No.3/Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal)-I, State Tax, Agra and the order dated March 13, 2021 passed by the respondent No.4/Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad-I, Agra. 3. Contention of the petitioner is that...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 01.01.2021 whereby the GST Registration of the petitioner was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.12.2017. Petitioner also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 01.09.2020. 2. Issue notice. Notice accepted by Learned counsel appearing for Respondent. With the consent of parties, petition is taken up for final disposal today. 3. Petitioner is a private limited company and was engaged in the business of m...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 28.12.2023 whereby the Show Cause Notice dated 24.10.2018 and 14.02.2020 have been disposed of. 2. A short counter affidavit filed by the respondent vide diary No. 1148301/2024 on 15.04.2024 is not on record. However, the original duly attested has been produced in Court. Same is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no effective date providing an opportunity of personal hearin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Heard Ms. K.R. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. S. Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue and Mr. A. Kedia, learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing for Opposite Party No.2. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the demand letter under Annexure-2. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respective parties contended that the matter is covered by the judgment ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER No.04/ Dated: 19th April 2024 Mr. Sachin Kumar, the learned Senior Standing Counsel seeks adjournment in these contempt cases on the ground that a Civil Review Petition seeking review of the judgment rendered in W.P.(T) No. 4885 of 2022 and analogous cases filed by M/s Techno Electric and Engineering Company Limited has been preferred by the Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (in short, JBVNL). 2. The judgment in W.P.(T) No. 4885 of 2022 and analogous cases was taken in appeal...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)