^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KCA INFRASTRUCTURE vs. LEARNED COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CENTRAL TAX CGST DELHI EAST
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SANJEEV SACHDEVA
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Pet. Counsel

Gaurav Gupta

Res. Counsel

Arun Khatri

Shelly Dixit

Petitioner / Applicant	KCA INFRASTRUCTURE
Respondent	LEARNED COMMISSIONER ADJUDICATION CENTRAL TAX CGST DELHI EAST
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Apr 22, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (C) 3884/2024 & CM APPL. 15998/2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 9477
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 28.12.2023 whereby the Show Cause Notice dated 24.10.2018 and 14.02.2020 have been disposed of. 2. A short counter affidavit filed by the respondent vide diary No. 1148301/2024 on 15.04.2024 is not on record. However, the original duly attested has been produced in Court. Same is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no effective date providing an opportunity of personal hearing was granted to the Petitioner. He submits that no notice of hearing was received for personal hearing on 03.11.2020 and petitioner received a notice for hearing on 04.01.2021. 4. As per petitioner, on 04.01.2021, Petitioner along with his representative had appeared and made detailed submissions before the Proper Officer and thereafter sought time to file written submissions, which were subsequently filed. However, no order was received and Petitioner got to know that the concerned Officer....