Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

VIVEK NARSARIA vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS


(Jharkhand High Court | Apr 26, 2024)

ORDER In the affidavit dated 26th April 2024, the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax Intelligence, Regional Unit, Jamshedpur has made the following statements:- “4 That in pursuant to Order No.4 dated 19.04.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Court in the case of Contempt Case (Civil) No. 158 of 2024, it is submitted that the letter for de-freezing of bank accounts of the petitioner have been issued vide letter F.No.DGGI/INV/GST/2150/2023-Gr....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GURPREET SINGH SABHARWAL vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 26, 2024)

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 09 25.08.2022 SVB Panchkula, District State Vigilance Bureau, Panchkula, Haryana   379, 414, 420 IPC; 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and 13 (2), 13(1) (a) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (120-B, 406, 409 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SADDLES INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE & AVIATION INTERI..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Apr 26, 2024)

(Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act). At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the APGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the APGST Act. The present appeal has been filed under Section 1...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER GENERATION CO. LTD


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chhatisgarh | Apr 26, 2024)

PROCEEDINGS [U/s 101 of the Chhattisgarh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein-after referred to as CGGST Act, 2017)] 1. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that (he provisions of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (here-in-after referred to as the “CGST Act”) & the Chhattisgarh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (here-in-after referred to as the “SGST/CGGST Act”) are mirror images of each other except for certain specific provisio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order dated 18.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition primarily on the ground that the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that he is engaged in the business of providing goods transport services. Consequently, it is stated that the services provided by the petitioner fall within the scope of the reverse charge mechanism. Upon receipt of notice in Form GST ASMT 10 dated 03.07.2023, the petitioner re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 29.12.2023 under the provisions of the TNGST Act, 2017, for the assessment year 2017-18. The petitioner has approached this Court after the lapse of limitation for filing the appeal under Section 107 of the respective GST enactments. 3. Para 7 of the affidavit reads as under...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 29.07.2023 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. The petitioner asserts that she was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned assessment order since the intimation, notice and impugned order were uploaded on the “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab on the GST portal, but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. The present writ petition was filed in th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER In W.P.No.11042 of 2024, an order in original dated 22.06.2023 is challenged and in W.P.No.11038 of 2024, an order dated 13.02.2023 imposing penalty for non filing of the annual return is challenged. 2. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the orders impugned herein because the notices and orders were uploaded on the GST portal, but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. The present writ petitions were filed in the s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent on 25.04.2023 in his proceedings bearing Ref.No.GSTIN. 33AECPY8766R1ZC/201-18. 3. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty and levied interest on the petitioner for a total sum of Rs. 4,49,318/- as detailed below:- Tax period ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dipak Seth, the learned counsel for the respondent-Union of India. 2. By means of the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner has challenged the validity of an order dated 08.11.2024, passed by Principal Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Commissionerate, Lucknow confirming the demand of service tax amounting to Rs....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)