^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VIVEK NARSARIA vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

NAVNEET KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Nitin Kumar Pasari

Res. Counsel

Sachin Kumar

P.a.s. Pati

Petitioner / Applicant	VIVEK NARSARIA
Respondent	THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Apr 26, 2024
Order No.	Contempt Case (Civil) No. 158 of 2024
Citation	2024(4) TAXREPLY 10843
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 16

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER In the affidavit dated 26th April 2024, the Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax Intelligence, Regional Unit, Jamshedpur has made the following statements:- “4 That in pursuant to Order No.4 dated 19.04.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Court in the case of Contempt Case (Civil) No. 158 of 2024, it is submitted that the letter for de-freezing of bank accounts of the petitioner have been issued vide letter F.No.DGGI/INV/GST/2150/2023-Gr.E/1882; 1884; 1886; 1888; 1890; 1892; 189 and 1896 dated 24.04.2024 and same has been intimated to the petitioner. 5. That the respondent No. 2 is humbly submitted that the Court may direct the petitioner to furnish bank guaranties equal to the approximate tax liabilities of the petitioner amounting to Rs.14 Crore (prima facie detection) to secure tax liabilities, which the petitioner has wrongly availed Input Tax Credit in contravention of Section 16 (2) of the CGST Act, 2017 on the strengt....