Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

CC. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C. SARAVANAN
Pet. Counsel
N. Sudalaimuthu
Res. Counsel
R. Suresh Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant

CC. ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS
Respondent THE STATE TAX OFFICER
Court Madras High Court
State

Tamilnadu

Date Apr 26, 2024
Order No.

W. P. (MD) No. 10276 of 2024 And W. M. P. (MD) No. 9250 of 2024

Citation

2024(4) TAXREPLY 9681
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

ORDER Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent on 25.04.2023 in his proceedings bearing Ref.No.GSTIN. 33AECPY8766R1ZC/201-18. 3. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the demand and imposed the penalty and levied interest on the petitioner for a total sum of Rs. 4,49,318/- as detailed below:- Tax period Act Tax Interest Penalty Total July 2017 to SGST Rs. 1,12,164/- Rs. 1,01,279/- Rs. 11,216/- Rs. 2,24,659/- March 2018 CGST Rs. 1,12,164/- Rs. 1,01,279/- ....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)