Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 10.05.2022 (hereafter the impugned cancellation order) passed by respondent no.2, whereby the petitioner’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) registration was cancelled with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017. The petitioner also impugns the Show Cause Notice dated 02.12.2021 (hereafter the impu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the raid conducted on 16.11.2023 be declared as illegal and in gross violation of the due process of law. The petitioner also impugns the Show Cause Notice dated 25.07.2024 (hereafter the impugned SCN) issued under Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) and the State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the SGST Act). 2. It is the ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by seeking for the following reliefs : (i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) including a writ of Certiorari for quashing/setting aside the order dated 06.12.2023, received on12.12.2023 issued in Form GST DRC-07 (Annexure-12) by the Respondent No.2 wherein the Petitioner has been directed to pay an amount of Rs.42,58,557/- under Section 73, along with interest at the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Petitioner challenges order in original dated 26th April, 2024. On query from Court Mr. Ray, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of petitioner submits, the order was not uploaded in the portal. As such, his client was prevented from preferring appeal, which is why he is before Court. Furthermore, the order was not passed in prescribed form of GST DRC-07. 2. Mr. Satapathy, learned advocate, Senior Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the department and draws attention...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Challenging the order of cancellation of registration dated 13th September, 2023 and the order rejecting the application for revocation of cancellation dated 2nd January, 2024, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Ms. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit that the show cause notice dated 7th August, 2023 only spells out that the registration of the petitioner had been obtained by means of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppressi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PEACOCK MENS HOSTEL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Aug 31, 2024)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai as under Sub-Section (1) of Section 100 of CGST Act / TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103(1) of the Act, Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER Sri. H.R. Kambiyavar., learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri. Shiva Prabhu Hiremath., learned AGA for respondents 1 to 3 have appeared in person. Sri. Girish S. Hulamani., learned counsel for respondent No.5 has appeared through video conferencing. 2. The order dated 17.09.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeals), Dharwad Division, Hubli in Appeal No.GST-05/2019-20 vide Annexure-A is called into question in this Writ Petition on several grou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJIV JINDAL vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 31, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN,J. 1. This bunch of bail applications arises out of three first information reports, which are: (i) FIR /Case Crime No. 203 of 2023, dated 04.05.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar (ii) FIR/Case Crime No. 248 of 2023, dated 01.06.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gataum Buddh Nagar, and (iii) FIR/Case Crime No. 255 of 2023, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FALGUNGIRI MINES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 31, 2024)

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Priyanka Midha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 4. 2. It has been informed by the parties that the issue with regard to the fact as to whether GST was to be paid on the royalty as was payable by the miners was engaging the attention of the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 37326 of 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also stated that in the SLP the payment of the GST on royalty paid for mining had been stay...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RENU SINGH vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND


(Jharkhand High Court | Aug 30, 2024)

ORDER Heard Mr. Nitin Kr. Pasari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned G.A.-III for the State. The petitioner has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail, as she is apprehending her arrest in connection with Telco P.S. Case No. 104/2018, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2027/2018. It has been alleged that one M/s. P.K. Traders at Telco, Jamshedpur being a non-existent Firm/Entity carried out transactions and claimed an amount of Rs. 7.23 Crores by way of Inp...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)