^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

KARTHIGA TRADERS vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, COIMBATORE
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

Pet. Counsel

G. Derrick Sam

Res. Counsel

V. Prashanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	KARTHIGA TRADERS
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER, COIMBATORE
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Nov 22, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 35477 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 38373 and 38374 of 2024
Citation	2024(11) TAXREPLY 11719
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the respondent dated 20.09.2023 relating to the assessment year 2018-19. 2. The petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Act, 2017. During the relevant period, the petitioner filed its return and paid the appropriate taxes. However, on verification of the petitioner's return, it was found that there were discrepancies between GSTR-01 and GSTR-3B and between the GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B. Subsequently, a notice was issued to the petitioner in ASMT-10 dated 10.12.2021, followed by series of notices on 17.08.2022 and 11.01.2023. Further, personal hearing was offered on 03.03.2023, 05.04.2023 and 20.04.2023. However, the petitioner had neither filed its reply nor availed the opportunity for a personal hearing. Hence, the impugned order came to be passed, confirming the proposal. 3. The impugned order is challenged on the premise that neither the show cause notices nor the impugned or....