Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 21.05.2024 for the assessment year 2019-2020. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier, the petitioner herein filed a Writ Petition before this Court in W.P.(MD).No.23261 of 2023 challenging the proceedings in Form GST DRC-07 dated 31.07.2023, whereby, this Court, after considering the submissions made on both sides, was pleased to pass the following order: “5. The ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioner is engaged in providing transportation services. He had GST registration with the respondent-department under Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act 2017. The GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled by the respondent, herein, vide impugned order dated 02.08.2023 for the reason of not conducting business from the declared place. 3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the said cancellation o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SURESH CHAND MEENA vs. ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU FARIDABAD AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Aug 30, 2024)

ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Section 07 04.04.2024 ACB, Faridabad 7 of PC Act 1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC, seeking anticipatory bail. 2. In paragraph 14 of the bail petition, the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SUJOY PAUL) Sri V. Siddharth Reddy, learned counsel, appears for the petitioner and Sri T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for the respondents. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. The singular pivotal question before us is whether the show cause notice for cancellation of registration and action of suspending the registration by order dated 27.0...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. These batch of petitions raising a common grievance regarding unreasoned orders passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 / Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act / DGST Act), were listed on 29.08.2024. This Court has briefly considered the controversy involved in these petitions and passed the following order: “1. The common issue that arises in these batch of petitions is that the orders passed under Sectio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed to quash the assessment order dated 20.02.2024, issued under Section 73 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017, for the financial year 2022-23, along with the summary of the order in Form DRC-07. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a registered dealer under the CGST and TNGST Acts and they are regularly filing GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns. In July 2022, the petitioner mistakenly claimed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.C. CONSTRUCTION vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHERS


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 30, 2024)

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) [1] Learned advocate Mr. Apurva Mehta for the petitioner and learned A.G.P. Mr. Raj Tanna for the respondents. [2] By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the order of cancellation of registration passed by the Assessing Officer has been upheld and the appeal was dismissed on the ground of limitation. [3] The petitioner challenged the order of cancellation of...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI Petitioner has filed the present review petition seeking review of final order dated 20.05.2024 passed in W.P. No. 12326/2024, whereby the petition filed by the Respondent No.1 has been allowed. 2. That while allowing the Writ Petition of Respondent No.1, following relief has been granted to the Respondent No.1 herein:- “11. Resultantly, in view of the foregoing discussion, this petition deserves to be allowed and is h...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition is filed challenging the order dated 05.02.2019 (hereafter ‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (‘CMM’), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, in Commissioner of Central Tax, GST Delhi (West) v. Adarsh Jain, whereby the respondent was admitted on bail. 2. It is the case of the prosecution that the respondent and the co-accused Rajesh Jindal were involved in generation of fake invoices ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPAK SINGHAL vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 30, 2024)

ORDER PER: JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI Heard finally at motion stage with consent of the parties. 1. The petitioner herein has filed the present petition seeking following reliefs from this court:- “7.1 To issue a writ of Mandamus thereby quashing the entire proceedings and ancillary proceedings in pursuance to the summons issued on 11/08/2021 against the petitioner. 7.2. To issue a writ of mandamus thereby quashing the proceedings instituted against the pet...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)