Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

EPCOS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | May 4, 2018)

As per the statement of the facts, the applicant M/S EPCOS India Pvt. Ltd. is a 100% subsidiary of EPCOS AG Germany which in turn is a subsidiary Of TDK corporation Japan. It has three manufacturing plants and four sales offices in India. The applicant has strong presence in India and export its product all over the globe as well. Under the ‘Make In India’ campaign the company has decided to start production of Power Bank which is used for charging portable electronic de...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BAHL PAPER MILLS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | May 4, 2018)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST Act and the rules made thereunder filed by Bahl Paper Mills Ltd., 5 KM Stone, Aliganj Road, Kashipur, Uttrakhand seeking an advance ruling on the question: (a) Whether under Reverse Charge Mechanism, IGST should be paid by the importer on ocean freight in case of CIF basis contract, when service provider and service recipient both are outside the territory of India. (b) If point no. answer is yes, then what will...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Shri Neerav Chitravanshi, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioners have challenged the seizure order dated 11.04.2018 as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition. The petitioners say that their goods have been seized despite the fact that they had all the relevant documents available with them. However, the seizure has been made on the ground that there was some discrepancy in the documents available with the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.B.G.C. LOGISTICS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 3, 2018)

ORDER Heard Sri Nishant Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.C. Tripathi representing the respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Sri B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.4 and 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has contended that he is not pressing the alternative prayer made in prayer no.A. The petitioner is aggrieved by the seizure of his goods seized vide impugned order dated 24.04.2018 passed by the Assistant C...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
We have heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that vide order dated 24.4.2018 the writ petition was allowed and the seizure order dated 16.4.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the Act and the consequential penalty notice dated 16.4.2018 issued under Section 129(3) of the Act were quashed and thus there was no justification to impose condition of furnishing of the indemnity bond to the extent of proposed tax and penalty for release of the goods and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SREEPATI RANJAN GOPE & SONS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | May 3, 2018)

1. The Applicant, stated to be an enlisted contractor engaged by the Railways for maintenance work of railway tracks, wants a ruling on the Classification and Rate of Tax when maintenance of railways tracks is done by them by providing contractor’s labour only in cases where the Railways supply materials free of cost and when maintenance of railways tracks is done by them by providing, both, contractor’s material and labour. Advance Ruling is admissible on this question under ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Anand Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel. Petitioner is a transporter and is challenging the seizure order dated 19.03.2018 and the consequential notice for levied of penalty dated 29.03.2018 issued under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017. Brief facts of the case are that the goods and vehicle was intercepted by the respondent no. 4 in District Agra, while the same was passing through the State of U.P. on its j...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has made an application on 05.04.2018 before the respondent authorities for reimbursement of additional Goods and Service Tax (GST) liability on civil contract and work order issued prior to implementation of Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 which is not being considered and decided despite the notification dated 05.04.2018 issued by the State Government. 2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India petitioners have challenged the authority of the State of U.P. for issuing the notification dated 21.07.2017 whereby which E-way bill-01 has been prescribed for the purposes of import of goods for an amount over and above ₹ 50,000/- from outside the State of U.P. into the State of U.P. under the newly introduced provisions of Goods and Service Tax Laws. The aforesaid aforesaid requirement has been prescribed by t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner, by way of present petition, seeks following reliefs: “a. Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to reopen the portal immediately enabling the Petitioner Company to revises the filed FORM TRAN- 1 having ARN AA231217013359G, so that the Electronic Credit Ledger is updated with the revised input credit. b. And in the event of non re-opening of the portal, the manually submitted revised Form TRAN -1 having ARN AA231217013359G by the petitioner ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)