Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,194 Results

K.P.H. DREAM CRICKET PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Punjab | Aug 20, 2018)

(Note: An Appeal against this order lies with the Appellate Authority in terms of Section 99 and Section 100 of the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 99 and Section 100 of the PGST Act, 2017 within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this order.) M/s. K.P.H. Dream Cricket Private Limited, Plot No. 372, Industrial Area, Phase-9, Mohali, SAS Nagar, Punjab-160062 hereinafter referred to as ‘applicant’ had submitted an application for advance ruling in form GST...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ICA PIDILITE PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CCST Act and MGST Act”] by ICA Pidilite Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the questions asked were in relation to the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GURUDEV SIDDHA PEETH


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Gurudev Siddha peeth, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question Does service involving n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAGARPATTA CLUB AND RESORTS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act"] by Magarpatta Club And Resorts Pvt Ltd , the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions : 1. Can...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SODEXO FOOD SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Sodexo Food Solutions India Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAMPADA CATERERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by SAMPADA CATERERS, PROPRIETOR MRS. SAMPADA SANTOSH HEDAOO the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following qu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SMITA GUPTA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Aug 18, 2018)

Note: Under Section 100 of the RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of RGST Act 2017, within a period of30 days from the date of service of this order. The Issue raised by the applicant is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under ambit of the Section 97(2) (a), it is given as under: (a) Classification of any goods or services or both; Further, the applicant being a registered perso...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAG SOLAR SYSTEM


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Aug 18, 2018)

Note: Under Section 100 of the RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of RGST Act 2017, within a period of30 days from the date of service of this order. The Issues raised by the applicant are fit to pronounce advance ruling as they fall under ambit of the Section 97(2) (e), it is as given under: (e) Determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both Further, the appli...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AAKASH ENGINEERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Daman Diu and DNH | Aug 17, 2018)

Any person deeming himself aggrieved by this Advance Ruling may appeal against the Ruling before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, in terms of Section 100 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. Such appeal shall be done within 30 days from the date of the communication of the order. The appeal papers shall bear fee of ₹ 10,000/- as provided under Rule 106(1) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules,2017. The Appeal should be filed in Form GST ARA-02, prescribed ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A notice dated May 15, 2018 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax, Kharagpur Range is under challenge in the present writ petition. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle. The notice for confiscation was issued to the driver of the vehicle. The order passed for confiscation, therefore, is without any basis. He refers to Section 130(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in support of his contention. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


16
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).