^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

RIVIGO SERVICES PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNA MURARI
ASHOK KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Suyash Agarwal

Res. Counsel

C.s.c

Petitioner / Applicant	RIVIGO SERVICES PVT. LTD.
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	May 3, 2018
Order No.	Civil Misc. Correction Application No. (2) of 2018 Writ Tax No. 689 of 2018
Citation	2018(5) TAXREPLY 2990
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
We have heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner. It is submitted that vide order dated 24.4.2018 the writ petition was allowed and the seizure order dated 16.4.2018 passed under Section 129(1) of the Act and the consequential penalty notice dated 16.4.2018 issued under Section 129(3) of the Act were quashed and thus there was no justification to impose condition of furnishing of the indemnity bond to the extent of proposed tax and penalty for release of the goods and vehicle, which was seized. It appears that the said part of the order has been incorporated inadvertently. Accordingly, the necessary correction is carried out by deleting the words "upon furnishing of the Indemnity Bond to the extent of proposed tax and penalty" Necesary corrections have been carried out in the order dated 24.4.2018. The correction application is allowed. ....