Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

In the petitioner's premises, the Sales Tax Department conducted search and seizure, under Rule 137 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (the Rules). It seized many documents, besides a pen drive. The Department, it seems, copied on to the pen drive certain electronic records available in the petitioner's computer system. 2. Later, the petitioner applied under Section 67(5) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, requesting the authority to provide copies of the doc...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. To use the input tax available to his credit at the time of migration, the petitioner had to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the stipulated time. He asserts that though he attempted to upload it within the time, he failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions to enable him to take credit of the available input tax. 2. H...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. To use the input tax available to his credit at the time of migration, the petitioner had to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the stipulated time. He asserts that though he attempted to upload it within the time, he failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions to enable him to take credit of the available input tax. 2. Heard the l...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. To use the input tax available to his credit at the time of migration, the petitioner had to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the stipulated time. He asserts that though he attempted to upload it within the time, he failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions to enable him to take credit of the available input tax. 2. Heard the l...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. N. Murali, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. T. Ramkumar, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of R1 to R4 and Mr. V. Sundaraswaran, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of R5. 2. The petitioner, who is a registered contractor with the Southern Railways, at Chennai Division, is before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to implement the instructions issued by the Second Respondent on 28. 10. 2007, in respect o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

YKK INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Haryana | Jul 11, 2018)

1. M/s. YKK India Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the “applicant”) is engaged in the business of supply of slide fasteners, chains, sliders etc. (‘Zipper’ or ‘Final Product’). In furtherance to its business of supply of the said Final Products mentioned above, the Applicant uses various goods as well as services for which the applicable tax under the CGST Act or the relevant State Act or Union Territory Acts under GST regime or Integrated G...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAZAGON DOCK SHIPBUILDERS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 11, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Shandong Heavy Industry India Pvt. Ltd, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. W...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COMPO ADVICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 11, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by COMPO ADVICE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Our produ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NORTH AMERICAN COAL CORPORATION INDIA PRIVATE LIMI..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 11, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and MGST Act"] by M/s. North American Coal Corporation India Private limited, the applicant, (hereinafter also referred to as, 'NACC) seeking an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREE CONSTRUCTION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 11, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by SHREE CONSTRUCTION, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions : 1. What Tax rate to be ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)