Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. The petitioner failed to upload the returns. He asserts that though he attempted to upload it within the time, he failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions to enable him to upload the returns. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader, as well as the learned Standing Counsel, besides per...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
2. The sum and substance of the prayer of the petitioners is that they are unable to upload Form GST TRAN-1 to take credit of the input tax/ service tax/central excise duty availed by them at the time of migration within the time stipulated. 3. The petitioners would state that they were unable to upload Form GST TRAN-1 within the time stipulated on account of some error. Therefore, the petitioners seek for appropriate direction in this regard. 4. Similar prayers we...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petitioner has approached this Court complaining that the consignment, which was loaded on a vehicle, was intercepted during the course of its transport from the petitioner's office and factory to the State of Gujarat. The petitioner claims that they are manufacturers of copper and copper alloy products. They are holding the necessary Central Excise registration till migration to Goods and Services Tax (GST). They are also admitting that the product is covered by Chapter Heading 74...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a company dealing in paints, faces proceedings under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act. As paint mixing machinery was seized by the authorities, the petitioner provided Ext.P6 bank guarantee as well as Ext.P6(a) security bond, before the 1st respondent, and had the machinery and the transport vehicle released. 2. At any rate, faced with adverse orders, the petitioner contemplates invoking the appellate remedy. Now, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition ventilati...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner was a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, now migrated to the Goods and Services Tax regime. To use the input tax available to his credit at the time of migration, the petitioner had to upload FORM GST TRAN-1 within the stipulated time. He asserts that though he attempted to upload it within the time, he failed because of some system error. The petitioner, therefore, seeks directions to enable him to take credit of the available input tax. 2. H...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In the batch of cases, there are varied prayers sought by the petitioners. The sum and substance of the prayer of the petitioners is that they are unable to upload Form GST TRAN-1 to take credit of the Input Tax /Service Tax/Central Excise Duty availed by them at the time of migration within the time stipulated. 2.The petitioners would state that they were unable to uploaded Form GST TRAN- 1 within the time stipulated on account of some error. Therefore, the petitioners seek for appro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M.U.N. AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jul 16, 2018)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M. U.N. AGRO INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect on the following questions. Wheth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Following the common judgment in W.A No.371/2018 & 699/2018 dated 13.07.2018, the judgment impugned in this writ appeal is set aside enabling the Department to proceed under Section 129 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Whether in the case of a transport, wherein obviously there is no tax liability on the goods, there could be a detention and seizure effected under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for brevity “CGST Act”] and Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for brevity “SGST Act”] and a release ordered as provided under sub-section (1) or order passed under sub-section (3) of Section 129, is the question raised in the appeal. We need to first ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This is an application for relaxation and/or modification and/or waiver of conditions of bail vide order dated 9th July, 2018 passed by this Court in CRR 3327 of 2018 thereby enlarging the petitioner on bail in connection with Case No.C-216 of 2018 arising out of DGCEI F. No.29/KZU/KOL/GR.D of 2018 dated 13th May, 2018 under Section 132(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 inter alia directing that the accused be released on bail on furnishing bond of the sum of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)