^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

V. RAMAKRISHNAN vs. UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, RAILWAY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI, FINANCIAL ADVISOR & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, CHENNAI, DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS) , CHENNAI, 5. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

Pet. Counsel

---

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	V. RAMAKRISHNAN
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA, NEW DELHI, RAILWAY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI, FINANCIAL ADVISOR & CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER, CHENNAI, DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (WORKS) , CHENNAI, 5. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, GST AND CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 11, 2018
Order No.	WP. No. 14798 of 2018
Citation	2018(7) TAXREPLY 2870
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Heard Mr. N. Murali, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. T. Ramkumar, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of R1 to R4 and Mr. V. Sundaraswaran, learned counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of R5. 2. The petitioner, who is a registered contractor with the Southern Railways, at Chennai Division, is before this Court seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to implement the instructions issued by the Second Respondent on 28. 10. 2007, in respect of the works contract services done by the petitioner for the work orders entered into prior to introduction of GST and works completed after implementation of GST. 3. In this regard, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to paragraph No. 3. 1 of the Circular dated 27. 10. 2017, issued by the second respondent, which reads as follows: “3. 1 For dealing with impact of GST in individual contracts, a supplementary agreement is to be entered into w....