Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,064 Results

TAKSH MEDIA PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Nov 30, 2018)

This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari/mandamums for quashing the Show Cause Notice bearing No. C. No. IV(6)HQAE/ GST/ TMPL/ 35PKL/ 2017/ 6400 dated 18.10.2018 (Annexure P-1), which according to the petitioner has been wrongly issued by respondent No.3 on the same cause of action, earlier show cause notice regarding service tax was issued to which reply has already been filed ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a proprietory firm, purchased LED TVs from Mysore, as seen from Ext.P2 invoice. Ext.P3 E-way bill, however, did not contain the details of the vehicle used for the transport. The vehicle and the goods detained, the petitioner filed this writ petition. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs: “(i) Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs or an order or a direction to quash Ext.P7 detention order and Ext.P8 notice...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is a transporter. When it was transported goods for a consignor, the Assistant State Tax Officer (“ASTO”) intercepted those goods and detained them, along with the vehicle. He issued the Ext.P4 order for physical verification/inspection of the conveyance, followed by the Ext.P7 notice under Section 129(3). The reason assigned for the detention is this: “Part B of the accompanied e-way bill has not completed, hence not valid for the movement of goods as...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is a cable TV and Internet services provider. It purchased a few Set Top Boxes. When it was transporting those goods, the Assistant State Tax Officer (“ASTO”) intercepted the conveyance on 14.11.2018 and detained them. The ASTO served the Ext.P5 notice, besides the Ext.P6 communication, setting out the discrepancy. In turn, the petitioner gave its Ext.P7 explanation and invited the Ext.P8 order. Assailing that order, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is a transporter. When it was transported goods for a consignor, the Assistant State Tax Officer (“ASTO”) intercepted those goods and detained them, along with the vehicle. He issued the Ext.P4 order for physical verification/inspection of the conveyance, followed by the Ext.P7 notice under Section 129(3). The reason assigned for the detention is this: “Part B of the accompanied e-way bill has not completed, hence not valid for the movement of goods as per...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RFE SOLAR PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Nov 29, 2018)

1. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act, 2017 and the RGST Act, 2017 are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the RGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafte...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Present petition is filed by the petitioner seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to exempt the petitioner from charging applicable taxes under the GST Legislations on sale of cosmetic products, perfumes etc. to the International passengers and claim refund of any input tax paid on input supplies and input services from the retail shop which the petitioner intends to set up at the Domestic Security Hold Area at Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar International Airport (hereinaft...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri N.C. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, Special Counsel for the respondents. The petitioner claims himself to be the registered purchasing dealer of the goods in transit which have been seized under Section 129 (1) of the U.P. Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short of the Act). Sri C.B. Tripathi, Special Counsel has produced the copy of the notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act specifying the tax and penalty payable both under clause (a)...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BALU RAMAMOORTHY SEKAR (PROP. OF M/S SAVANI SCREEN..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 28, 2018)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S JVS TEX


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 28, 2018)

Note : Any Appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pr...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


7
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).