Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

SAHEER P.M. vs. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXES) , GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SURVEILLANCE, WAYANAD, THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) , NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NET WORK, NEW DELHI AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES, KERALA
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
Pet. Counsel
K.p.pradeep
Nirmal V Nair
Res. Counsel
M.m.jasmine
Sreelal N Warrier
P.r.sreejith

Petitioner / Applicant

SAHEER P.M.
Respondent STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY (TAXES) , GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE GST, KERALA STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPARTMENT, KERALA, ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER, SURVEILLANCE, WAYANAD, THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY THE SECRETARY (REVENUE) , NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX COUNCIL THROUGH ITS CHAIRPERSON, NEW DELHI, GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NET WORK, NEW DELHI AND CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAXES, KERALA
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Nov 30, 2018
Order No.

WP (C). No. 39043 of 2018

Citation

2018(11) TAXREPLY 2732
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The petitioner, a proprietory firm, purchased LED TVs from Mysore, as seen from Ext.P2 invoice. Ext.P3 E-way bill, however, did not contain the details of the vehicle used for the transport. The vehicle and the goods detained, the petitioner filed this writ petition. 2. In the writ petition, the petitioner sought the following reliefs: “(i) Issue writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs or an order or a direction to quash Ext.P7 detention order and Ext.P8 notice and to issue necessary directions to the 3rd respondent to release the goods detained under Exts.P7 and P8, forthwith to the petitioner (ii) Issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs or an order or a direction to the 3rd respondent to allow the petitioner to transport the goods covered by Exts.P2 and P9 invoice and Ext.P3 E-way Bill subject to appropriate conditions fixed by this Court in the facts and circumstances of the case; (iii) Issue such other and further rel....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).