Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEER.. vs. SUDARSANS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jan 31, 2019)

1. The present report dated 31.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Proflteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KIRAN CHIMIRALA vs. JUBILANT FOODS WORKS LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jan 31, 2019)

1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 an application through e-mail dated 29.11 2017 (Annexure-I of the Report) was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent stating that he had purchased 1 SGB Stuffed GB (Garlic Bread) and 1 Med NHT Veg Extrava (Medium Veg Pizza) after paying ₹ 129/- and ₹ 440/- per item respectively vide tax Invoice No. 66065/17/66210 dated 20.10.2017 (Annexure-2 of the Report) from the ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAILASH CHANDRA (M/S MALI CONSTRUCTION)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The issue raised by Mr. Kailash Chandra, (M/s. Mali Construction), situated at Mali Vas, Maandava, Mandwa, Sirohi, Rajasthan - 307001 (hereinafter called as the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the am....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHYAM SINGH CHAMPAWAT (M/S LAXMI MACHINERY STORE)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The Issue raised by Shyam Singh Champawat, M/s. Laxmi Machinery Store, Station Road, Bhinmal, District - Jalore-343029 {hereinafter the applicant} to pronounce advance ruling falls under ambit of the Section 97(2) (a) and it is given....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAILASH CHANDRA (M/S. MALI CONSTRUCTION)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The issue raised by Mr. Kailash Chandra, (M/s. Mali Construction), situated at Mali Vas, Maandava, Mandwa, Sirohi, Rajasthan - 307001 (hereinafter the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Sect....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SEALWEL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed U/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APSGT Act respectively) by M/s Sealwel Corporation Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &a....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SHIRDI SAI ELECTRICALS LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APSGT Act respectively) by M/s Shirdi Sai Electricals Limited., (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. GVS PROJECTS (P) LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. GVS Projects Private Limited.,(hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Service....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PHILODEN INDUSTRIES PVT LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 30, 2019)

1. Pursuant to the order dated 29.1.2019, the petitioner has made applications for allowing the credit of central excise and VAT under the FORM-GST TRAN-1 to both the authorities, namely, the State Tax Authorities as well as the Central Tax Authorities. However, upon hearing Mr. Nirzar Desai, learned senior standing counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4 and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the newly added respondents No.6 and 7, it appears that there is a dispute ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the circular dated 17.08.2017 (Annexure-1) issued by the State Government whereby the persons who are dealing with HSD has been directed to pay GST. The issue was before different High Courts, more particularly, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Carpo Power Limited –v- State of Haryana and Ors., which wa....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
26
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).