Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

DILEEP TRADING CORPORATION


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Feb 3, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to as “the Act”) by M/s. Dileep Trading Corporation, 618, Mahaveer Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302018 (Raj.) against the Refund Sanction/Rejection Order No. CGST DIV-F/69/2018/4664, dated 1-6-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) filed under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, CGST Divisio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
[1] This common order shall dispose of the abovementioned seven (07) Review Applications moved by the applicant-respondent(s)/UOI, as the same relate to identical issue / prayer. For the facility of reference, facts are being culled out from RA-CW No. 39 of 2020 in CWP No. 36863 of 2019. [2] Review Application (RA-CW No. 39 of 2020) under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the applicant-respondent(s) / Union of India, seeking review of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By this common order, both the writ petitions are being disposed. In W.P.No.2266 of 2020, the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 8.12.2018 denying the transitional input tax credit availed by the petitioner for the period between July 2017 and December 2017 on the works contact. 2. Against the said order, the petitioner had attempted to upload the appeal. However, the petitioner was unable to upload the appeal memorandum. Since the petitioner encountered difficulties in up...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows: “(i) To quash Ext.P-3 order issued by 1st respondent by the issue of a writ of certiorari or such other writ or order or direction. (ii) To grant the petitioner such other incidental reliefs including the cost of these proceedings.” 2. Heard Sri.Harisankar V.Menon, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri. Sreelal N.Warrier, learned Standing Counsel for the Central Board of Indirect Taxes, Governme...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayers in the afore-captioned Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows: “(i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, calling for the records leading to the issue of Exhibit P-2 Order and after scrutinizing the same, to strike down and quash the same and to hold that in the given set of facts available before the AAR, the transaction in question would not attract GST...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANMOHAN LALMAN AGARWAL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 31, 2020)

1. This application is filed by the applicants under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with file No.IV/06-Prev/32/Gr.IV/2019-20 with Central GST and Central Excise, Vadodara-II for the offence punishable under provisions of GST Act. 2. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants would submit that considering the nature of offence, the applicants may be enlarged on anticipatory bail by i...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The case set up in this writ petition is as follows:- Petitioners are contractors having registration as Class-'C' and obtained registration from the 1st respondent. The petitioners have successfully completed the works of various departments of the Government. In the work schedule allotted to them for the said works, it was not stated that the amount due under the GST will be reduced at the time of disbursement of bill amount. Hence, while clearing the bills, GST amount was not r...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NELCO LIMITED. vs. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.


(Bombay High Court | Jan 31, 2020)

This group of matters was placed on board because the Petitioners have challenged the denial by the Respondents to carry forward the Input Tax Credit from the pre-GST regime. The Petitioners have raised various issues. By consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we have taken up Writ Petition No.6998/2018 as a petition where the challenge to Rule 117 being ultra vires to the the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is taken first. Second prayer is in the facts of the case...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The case set up in this W.P.(C.) is as follows : that the petitioner is a Partnership firm, registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. The petitioner has GST registration in the State of Kerala as well as Karnataka. The GST registration allotted to the petitioner's firm in Karnataka is 29ABAFM7776Q1Z8 and GST number allotted in Kerala State is 32ABAFM7776Q1ZL. The firm is engaged in the business of Timber and Timber products. In the course of its business, the pet...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows:- “(i) issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case, calling for the records leading to the issue of Ext.P6 order and Ext.P7 notice and to quash them; (ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, orders or directions, directing the 1st respondent to release the goods to the petition...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).